Conclusion : cases ordered to be struck out of the list, subject to the possibility of their being restored thereto in the event of a new situation justifying such a course (unanimously).

Conclusion : cases ordered to be struck out of the list, subject to the possibility of their being restored thereto in the event of a new situation justifying such a course (unanimously).

Conclusion : cases ordered to be struck out of the list, subject to the possibility of their being restored thereto in the event of a new situation justifying such a course (unanimously).

Conclusion : cases ordered to be struck out of the list, subject to the possibility of their being restored thereto in the event of a new situation justifying such a course (unanimously).

Conclusion : cases ordered to be struck out of the list, subject to the possibility of their being restored thereto in the event of a new situation justifying such a course (unanimously).

Conclusion : cases ordered to be struck out of the list, subject to the possibility of their being restored thereto in the event of a new situation justifying such a course (unanimously).

Conclusion : cases ordered to be struck out of the list, subject to the possibility of their being restored thereto in the event of a new situation justifying such a course (unanimously).

    On 23 February 2024 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant company through the Court’s Electronic Communications Service (eComms) inviting it to inform the Court of any developments

  SCOPE OF THE CASE BEFORE THE COURT The Court has no jurisdiction to revive complaints which the Commission had declared inadmissible. II.

  The President of Court, Jean-Paul Costa, welcomed the first and long-awaited results of Protocol No.

  Costs and expenses Before domestic courts and Commission: reimbursement not claimed. Before Court: legal aid granted; reimbursement not claimed.

    On 12 October 2004 the Sabail District Court dismissed the applicant’s claim and upheld E.D.’s counter-claim, finding that the applicant and his family had unlawfully occupied the building

The defendant in that case, J.Č., brought a counter-action against the applicants in the same court seeking to have late I.K.’s will declared null and void. 5.

By a final decision of 28 June 2019 the Riga Regional Court dismissed that request and ordered his detention to be continued.

On 19/11/2010, the Municipal Court of Koprivnica rendered a judgment in the reopened proceedings and applied directly the Court’s case-law.

  The bail proposed by the applicant cannot, in the court's opinion, secure the due course of the proceedings against him.

Monsieur X X a saisi la commission d'accès aux documents administratifs, par courrier enregistré à son secrétariat le 08 mars 2015, à la suite du refus opposé par le président du conseil départemental

In these circumstances, the Court is of the view that the applicant, through his conduct, had waived his right to appear at the hearing in an unequivocal manner and that his waiver did not run counter

To date, the Supreme Court’s decision has not yet been submitted to the Court. 3.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, DEUXIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur les pourvois n° J 96-15.411, F 96-19.410 formés par : 1 / la société Sara assurances, dont