In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied, the Court takes a comprehensive view (see   Jokela v.

Turning lastly to the procedural requirement inherent in Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, among other authorities, Jokela v.   Finland , no.

    The applicant was born in 1992 and lives in Jomala. A.     Criminal proceedings against the applicant 6.

Estonia , no. 12951/11, §§   72 and 74, 15 January 2015, and Jokela v. Finland , no. 28856/95, §   45, ECHR 2002 ‑ IV).

In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied, a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable judicial and administrative procedures (see Jokela v.

In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied, a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable procedures (see, among other authorities, Jokela v.

In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied, a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable procedures (see, among other authorities, Jokela v.

the view that the cartoons and two articles in question had not overstepped the limits of admissible criticism under Article 10 of the Convention, because the impugned expressions had been used in a jocular

case to the competent authorities with a view to enabling them to establish a fair balance between the conflicting interests at stake (see Paulet , cited above, § 65; AGOSI , cited above, § 55; and Jokela

In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied, a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable procedures (see Jokela v. Finland , no.

Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44302/02, § 52, ECHR 2007 ‑ III; Jokela v.

In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied, the Court takes a comprehensive view (see Jokela v.

It is obvious that these ‘I’d Really Rather You Didn’ts’ are a jocular variation on the Ten Commandments from the Jewish-Christian tradition. 9.4.

reasonable opportunity for putting his case to the competent authorities with a view to enabling them to establish a fair balance between the conflicting interests at stake ( AGOSI , cited above, § 55, and Jokela

In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied, a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable judicial and administrative procedures (see Jokela v.

private-interest litigation between private parties, there were no “responsible authorities” to whom a claimant could sensibly make representations “challenging the measures interfering with [his] rights” (see Jokela

In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied, a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable procedures (see, among other authorities, Jokela v.

In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied, a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable procedures (see, among other authorities, Jokela v.

In ascertaining whether this condition has been satisfied, a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable procedures (see, among other authorities, Jokela v.