CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 746 résultats pour « Briolin »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623DEC003772705

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2009

23 juin 2009

In 1939 they left Kraków for Lwów, later went to China and finally settled in Great Britain where they lived during the last years of the Second World War.

Page 71 sur 88

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214JUD006754509

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2010

14 décembre 2010

Experiments with midwife-managed care in hospitals in Britain, Australia and Sweden showed that women's satisfaction with such care was much higher than with standard care.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0116JUD006068200

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2007

16 janvier 2007

    The case originated in an application (no. 60682/00) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0219JUD002162793

Admin. suprême

19 février 1997

19 février 1997

  21627/93, 21826/93 and 21974/93) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) on 14 December 1992 by three British nationals

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024JUD004042698

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2006

24 octobre 2006

    The case originated in an application (no. 40426/98) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0924JUD002594294

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 1997

24 septembre 1997

  25942/94) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission under Article   25 by Mr   Paul Matthew Coyne, a British citizen, on 23   November

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1023JUD002131993

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 1997

23 octobre 1997

    The case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) and by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“the Government

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0925JUD005279299

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2003

25 septembre 2003

In the aforementioned McVeigh and Others decision, the applicants, three men between thirty-one and fifty ‑ eight years old, were submitted to a security check on entering Great Britain, an obligation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0927JUD003141796

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 1999

27 septembre 1999

    The case originated in two applications against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0610JUD002239993

Admin. suprême

10 juin 1996

10 juin 1996

  It originated in an application (no. 22399/93) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) by a British national, Mr Robert

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1980:1106JUD000653874

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 1980

6 novembre 1980

The case originated in an application against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission in 1974 by Times Newspapers Limited, the publisher of the British weekly

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214JUD003196507

Admin. suprême

14 février 2012

14 février 2012

    The case originated in an application (no. 31965/07) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0929DEC007360114

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2020

29 septembre 2020

paragraph was that of the Armenian Bible Society, sent in response to an enquiry from the head of the TIR Customs Office as to whether it imported any religious literature from Germany, Poland and Great Britain

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2018

13 septembre 2018

  58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0924JUD004229598

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 2002

24 septembre 2002

    The case originated in an application (no. 42295/98) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0624JUD004427798

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2003

24 juin 2003

  44277/98) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-68470

Admin. suprême

23 février 2005

23 février 2005

police service may provide aid to another, the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) may request that an incident be investigated by officers from a police service from Great Britain

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115JUD004842010

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2013

15 janvier 2013

  48420/10, 59842/10, 51671/10 and 36516/10) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013

Admin. suprême

25 mai 2021

25 mai 2021

  58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0503JUD002452708

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2012

3 mai 2012

    The case originated in an application (no. 24527/08) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

Source officielle