CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 561 résultats pour « obligation de circuler en file simple »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1026JUD003098596

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2000

26 octobre 2000

The Supreme Court again ordered the transmission of the file to the Council of Ministers for registration. 38.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0915JUD002968005

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2015

15 septembre 2015

    The applicant was not apprised of the appeals on points of law lodged by the commanding officer and the Military Prosecutor, both of which were added to the case file. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623JUD001708903

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2009

23 juin 2009

Blaming [the applicant] for the unsatisfactory result, the same candidate filed an action for damages, alleging that he had been beaten by [the applicant].

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0324JUD001336311

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2020

24 mars 2020

    The applicant appealed against the above decision to the North Caucasus Military Circuit Court (“the Military Circuit Court”), stating, amongst other things, that the decision had failed

Source officielle
CC

cr

6137264ecd580146774248a9

Cassation

17 juin 2003

17 juin 2003

de main-d'oeuvre ; "aux motifs qu'Olivier X... et Philippe Y..., qui ont concouru à la mise en place d'un système tendant à transformer des "transporteurs indépendants" nommément désignés en de simples

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1961:0701JUD000033257

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 1961

1 juillet 1961

The letter of 14th March 1961, a copy of which was sent to the Irish Government, was likewise added to the file on the case. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705JUD004158805

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2011

5 juillet 2011

According to the applicants, that video had been part of a criminal case-file and not for public use. This information was not disputed by the Government.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1130JUD006973612

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2021

30 novembre 2021

The decision then referred to S.K.’s statement that she had been outside the classroom for only five minutes.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0516JUD001180010

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2017

16 mai 2017

    The police officials filed a written objection, arguing that the Internal Rules governing Detention Facilities for Administrative Detainees did not provide administrative detainees with the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0110DEC003709397

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2002

10 janvier 2002

Cable broadcasting simply has to be notified to the Broadcasting Authority. The applicant contests the Government’s view.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0124JUD002978703

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2008

24 janvier 2008

She explained that a few hours after arriving in the “INADS Centre” they had simply been returned to the transit zone and told to fend for themselves in order to obtain food, drink and a return ticket.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0503JUD002452708

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2012

3 mai 2012

They had simply been unprepared, which was insufficient to ground a violation of Article 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0521JUD007075812

Admin. suprême

21 mai 2015

21 mai 2015

2003 the medical examination of the applicant ordered by the District Police revealed that she suffered from closed head injury, concussion, post-traumatic encephalopathy, hearing deterioration and circle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1207JUD005033007

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2010

7 décembre 2010

    On 18 October 2004, the Circuit Judge varied the order of the County Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD004646616

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2019

8 octobre 2019

It had simply considered that the circular at issue was necessary in a democratic society; moreover, she had been dismissed without any examination of the content of the interview.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002355694

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 1999

8 juillet 1999

On 7 September 1998 the Government filed documents to be appended to their memorial and on 25   February 1999 they filed observations on the applicant’s claims for just satisfaction. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1202JUD006196008

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2014

2 décembre 2014

They contended that there was nothing in the case file to show that the proceedings brought by the applicant had been unfair. 71.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0330JUD002132918

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2023

30 mars 2023

This label was filled in for each foreigner with an indication of the general data relating to each person interviewed.

Source officielle
CC

civ2

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:C210254

Cassation

29 mars 2018

29 mars 2018

disque dur ou d'un véhicule, en lien avec l'accident, n'est pas démontrée ; Il n'est pas justifié de l'achat d'un ordinateur, la pièce 105 portant la mention « non acheté » et la pièce 106 étant un simple

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0317DEC000188218

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2020

17 mars 2020

But at all other times crimes are simply potentially under investigation and every such case which may have gone cold cannot realistically be the subject of constant review.

Source officielle

Page 71 sur 79

← PrécédentSuivant →