CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Cour administrative d'appel de Toulouse
ORCA_23TL01980_20231128
28 novembre 2023
A, représenté par Me Belaïche, demande à la cour : 1°) d'annuler ce jugement du 6 juillet 2022 du magistrat désigné par le président du tribunal administratif de Nîmes ; 2°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 11
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327DEC000794505
27 mars 2008
On 18 June 1999 the Constitution was amended and the military judge sitting on the bench of the İstanbul State Security Court was replaced by a civilian judge.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-68033
22 décembre 2004
on 10 October 2003) in four cases against Turkey (see Appendix) concerning the lack of independence and impartiality of the State Security Courts on account of the presence of a military judge on the bench
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3257
1 juin 2006
of which remained unknown, had probably occurred while the victim was in custody, and that the most likely explanation was that he had fallen, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, from the concrete bench
ECLI:CEDH:002-7048
6 juin 2000
As regards the impartiality of the bench, it was necessary to ascertain whether, independently of the personal attitude of its members, certain facts were able to cast doubt on the impartiality of the
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2150175-2283914
18 octobre 2007
Mr July also complains, under Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial), that he was not heard by an independent court, as two out of the three judges on the bench of the Paris Court of Appeal which ruled
ECLI:CEDH:001-207317
8 décembre 2020
between 1991 and 1997 (violations of Article 3 and 13); and a violation of the right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal on account of the presence of a military judge on the bench
Chambre des référés
695ec686cdc6046d478c01c1
6 janvier 2026
Il ressort des éléments versés aux débats par les parties que le périmètre de l’AFUL englobe plusieurs immeubles en copropriété, dont notamment le Victoria Beach.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0127DEC004989299
27 janvier 2004
The applicant complains under Article 6 of the Convention that he was denied a fair hearing on account of the presence of a military judge on the bench of the Malatya State Security Court.
Cabinet B
64d9de523fbc7ed969233132
10 août 2023
France, de nationalité française, demeurant à [Adresse 5] ; Représentée par Me Marie EFTIMIE-SPITZ, avocat au barreau de Papeete ; Intimés : Mme [R] [I] [T] épouse [L], gérante du Snack Tarahu Beach
3ème chambre 2ème section
67003210c34eb4cc8578976a
4 octobre 2024
délivrées le : - Maître CANIVET #D10 - Maître GUETTA #A541 Décision du 04 Octobre 2024 3ème chambre - 2ème section N° RG 23/14566 - N° Portalis 352J-W-B7H-C3IZ7 MAGISTRAT DE LA MISE EN ETAT Madame Irène BENAC
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0211DEC003658115
11 février 2020
On 11 November 2015 the Military Bench of the Budapest High Court convicted the officers of ill-treatment committed in official capacity, grave bodily assault and light bodily assault.
1ère Chambre
DTA_2300067_20260310
10 mars 2026
annuler la délibération du conseil exécutif de la collectivité de Saint-Barthélemy n°2023-592 CE, en date du 17 mai 2023, par laquelle la demande de permis de construire présentée par la société Shell Beach
ECLI:CEDH:001-99499
3 juin 2010
days before being brought before a judge: violation of Article 5, paragraph 3), and of his right to a fair trial by an independent and impartial court due to the presence of a military judge on the bench
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223216
25 janvier 2023
On 4 May 2021 the Supreme Court, sitting as a criminal bench of three judges, which included judge K.K., dismissed the applicants’ cassation appeal as inadmissible.
CH GENERALISTE B
6a0f4a08cdc6046d477b11af
21 mai 2026
ASSURANCES DU CREDIT MUTUEL GROSSE(S)délivrée(s) le à la SELARL BOTTAI-BELLAICHE Me Cyrille MICHEL COPIE(S)délivrée(s) le à la SELARL BOTTAI-BELLAICHE Me Cyrille MICHEL N° 2026 CH GÉNÉRALISTE
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0127JUD007379701
Moreover, if contempt proceedings had been brought before a different bench, there would have been certain undesirable consequences that could not have been overlooked: the members of the bench would have
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0526JUD004878112
26 mai 2020
The appeal was heard by a bench of three judges. 9 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0716JUD004137321
16 juillet 2024
    The Court decides on the merits of individual applications as a full bench. The quorum of the plenary session is two-thirds of the full bench, or six judges (section 32(1)). 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0725JUD004855399
25 juillet 2002
In two judgments of 12 January 1999 the bench dismissed the appeals relating to Cases nos. 13/10-98 and 70/10-98, reproducing the set formulas used by the first-instance court. E.
Page 72 sur 226