They had not been convicted of any of the crimes alleged in the statements and no evidence had been offered by N.G. in this connection. 12.

They then informed the family of the actual Mr Ali Köksal of the arrest and the hospitalisation.

  In the alternative they submitted that there was no violation of the Convention.   47.

When the first applicant asked them why they were there, they ordered her in Russian to lie on the floor and pushed her to the ground.

  Not disregarding the explanations given by the applicants, the Commission finds, in these circumstances, that their fears cannot be considered credible.

They invoke Article 6 of the Convention in this respect. THE LAW A.   Arguments before the Court a.

In their initial application, they complained that the proceedings meant to result in the demolition of the houses in which they lived, during which the authorities had not discussed with them any alternative

Ultimately they decide to have the child but they decide to do so in order to save their relationship, one might say for somewhat impure motives, they feel that having this child will keep them together

to enable them to provide for the needs of their child throughout his life; The Maurice v.

It then stated that there were also allegations that the false certificate might have been signed by the first applicant, who had denied this.

In support of this claim they submitted the relevant receipts.

There, during the several hours preceding their formal arrest, they wrote the above-mentioned explanations confessing to the crime.

There, during the several hours preceding their formal arrest, they wrote the above-mentioned explanations confessing to the crime.

The applicants contributed to the duration of the proceedings as, on the one hand, the documents submitted by them showed deficiencies and inconsistencies and, on the other hand, they repeatedly filed

out by some of them in Afghanistan, their meeting in that country with those implicated in the Belgian proceedings, the role played by the latter in the GICM’s international structure and their activities

At this hearing, the applicant stated that when she had visited her daughters in 1996, they had only just left hospital where they had been admitted after their grandmother had used massage oil in the

They relied, among other grounds, on the fact that the family S had been using the flat, as their home, for decades; that the flat had already been burdened with an occupancy right when the applicant’s

They further noted that the case file had not contained their son’s wife’s and their granddaughter’s statements which had been given shortly after the incident, and that the investigation had baselessly

Beginning on 24 August 1997, the final day of the statutory period during which the applicants could be expelled, the authorities attempted on three occasions to expel them via Prague, and then Cairo and