On the basis of that court decision, on 17 January 2005 the prosecutor J.L. issued a European Arrest Warrant in respect of the applicant. 9.

    The applicant requested the Cahul District Court to issue an enforcement warrant, which was apparently refused.

of arrest and                 search warrant.

against the debtor, or (b) fix a term of imprisonment and postpone the issue of a warrant until such time and on such conditions (if any) as the court thinks just.

He denied, and demanded to be given a warrant allowing the officers to proceed with their actions.

It further considered that the investigating judge's failure to introduce the applicant's application for the revocation of the arrest warrant before the Chamber did not vitiate the judge's subsequent

On 4 March 1987 the Genoa public prosecutor’s office issued a warrant for Mr T.’s arrest.

They concluded that the applicant's failure to pay the community charge was due to his wilful refusal and issued a warrant committing him to prison for 30 days.

    A new warrant of arrest was issued on 22 January 1992.

A subsequent search of the applicant and of his car, carried out in a garage at the premises of the customs, revealed a further DM 73,870, which were found in a wallet in the applicant’s back pocket, in

. # Office des produits wallons ASBL contra Estado Belga. # Pedido de decisão prejudicial: Tribunal de première instance de Charleroi - Bélgica. # Sexta Directiva IVA - Artigo 11.º, A, n.º 1, alínea a)

Zeichen oder Angaben bestehen, die im allgemeinen Sprachgebrauch oder in den redlichen und ständigen Verkehrsgepflogenheiten üblich sind - Erfordernis, dass die Zeichen oder Angaben zur Bezeichnung der Waren

FRANCE [Adresse 3] PARIS Registre du Commerce et des Sociétés de Paris n°881419634 (Avocat postulant : Maître Sylvie RUEDA-SAMAT, Avocat au barreau de Marseille) (Avocat plaidant : Maître Patricia WALENT

Furthermore, he violently snapped the gold necklace from the applicant’s neck and grabbed his wallet. The applicant called for help and his neighbours came and took him to the hospital.

    On 29 January 1999 an arrest warrant was issued against the applicant by the Polish authorities.

  In 2003, the applicant was arrested at Amsterdam airport under an international arrest warrant issued by the Italian authorities.

This record indicated that she had been arrested because “the investigator, with the prosecutor’s approval, had sought a detention warrant before the court in respect of [the first applicant]”.

The applicant’s counsel submitted that these notes should not be admitted in evidence because the police had not had a warrant under section 2 of the Interception of Communications Act 1985 (“the 1985

The warrant was not made available to the Court.