He remained at the police station for approximately ten hours. No documents concerning his detention were issued. 11.

The normal average working day is a maximum of eight hours. For equal work, women shall receive equal pay to men.

However, the medical expert documented certain injuries on the applicant’s body at 00.47   a.m. on 17 May 2008, within about an hour of his release from the police station. 61.

The counsel argued that the applicant’s 24-hour regimen required 71 insulin units and therefore his detention in a regular detention facility ran contrary to the domestic legal requirements. 18.

The ill-treatment had lasted about three hours. He had then been placed in the temporary detention facility.

The first applicant fell and hurt her arm and leg, but the men continued to drag her.

For this detention, which lasted for more than twelve hours, Superintendent Blang was responsible.

Mr Bennett ran away but did not drop his firearm and went behind a pillar, from which Officer A described him as looking out in a crouched position.

  The respondent Government submit that a hearing on neutral ground could not possibly be arranged as the police have no authority to move the applicant from his house until they have the court's

This was a statutory consultation   exercise under section 25 of the Local Government Act 2000, which required local authorities to draw up proposals for the operation of “executive arrangements”

Particularly, referring to the construction standards applicable to multi-storey residential houses, it noted that the requirements of the domestic law had been complied with, as it was ensured that the

  On 10 November 1989, the applicant was informed by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals that he could not appeal to the House of Lords, since he had not had a substantive appeal dismissed by the Court

On 9 February 1998 a search was carried out in the applicant’s house where some religious books were found, including the Koran and the Great Islam Catechism ( Risale-i Nur Külliyatı ).

On that date the court appointed a new expert because the first one had moved house and it had not been possible to summon him.

People had started to block the road spontaneously with stones in order to draw the authorities’ attention to their claims.

Although the CO did not draw up the charges himself, he had the power to amend or substitute any charge presented to him (see sections 76(1) and (2) of the 1955 Act as amended, paragraph 24 above, and

    On 17 December 2014 the Adlerskiy District Court, Sochi convicted the applicant under Article 306 (perjury) of the Criminal Code and sentenced him to 300 hours of mandatory work.

This is the case with commercial premises, such as shops, theatres and restaurants, as well as private premises (for example, there is a presumption that a house owner authorises people to come up the

The oculist prescribed some eye drops and advised the applicant to undergo regular medical observation.