CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1115JUD005870700
15 novembre 2005
Constitution, Constitutional Court Act and the Constitutional Court’s practice 32.
Page 73 sur 2431
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009DEC001964305
9 octobre 2007
On 13 March 2003, on the applicant’s complaint under Article 127 of the Constitution, the Constitutional Court ( Ústavný súd ), found that the District Court had violated the applicant’s right under Article
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0223JUD004339509
23 février 2017
’ freedom of movement could be restricted in accordance with Article 16 of the Constitution. 49.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004JUD003746209
4 octobre 2016
In so doing he relied on Article 14 paragraph 2 , Article 26 and Article 29 paragraph 1 of the Croatian Constitution (see paragraph 26 below).
Chambre des déférés
63d22a7f9b3c8605deec1f53
25 janvier 2023
Elle réclame le paiement de la somme de 2500 € par application des dispositions de l'article 700 du code de procédure civile.
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2021:C100725
24 novembre 2021
du présent article.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115140
7 novembre 2012
number of constitutional provisions, including the principle of protection of private and family life (Article 47 of the Constitution), the principle of proportionality (Article 31 § 3 of the Constitution
cr
613725d9cd58014677420fee
11 décembre 2002
décision ; que seul est recevable le pourvoi formé le 4 décembre 2001 ; I - Sur le pourvoi formé contre l'arrêt du 15 mars 2001 : Sur le premier moyen de cassation, pris de la violation des articles
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0113JUD001573302
13 janvier 2005
Article 76 “By its decision to accept a constitutional complaint, the Constitutional Court shall quash the disputed act by which a constitutional right has been violated...” THE LAW I.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108JUD006300310
8 novembre 2016
Article 83 § 1 “A constitutional appeal may be lodged by any individual who believes that any of his or her human or minority rights or freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution has been violated
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0704DEC003246722
4 juillet 2023
Under Article 140 § 1 (1)(c) of the Federal Constitution every person can challenge the constitutionality of a law directly before the Constitutional Court if he/she alleges
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0526DEC002763208
26 mai 2009
On 13 September 2007 the Constitutional Court found that the District Court had violated the applicant’s right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified delay.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619DEC001800614
19 juin 2018
The publisher challenged the judgment of 11 December 2008 by way of a complaint under Article 127 of the Constitution, alleging, inter alia , a violation of its freedom of expression
61372639cd58014677423e6a
4 mai 2006
de la Direction nationale d'enquêtes fiscales à procéder conformément aux dispositions de l'article L. 16 B du Livre des procédures fiscales aux visites et saisies nécessitées par la recherche de la preuve
2ème chambre
CETAT:CETATEXT000037513375
22 octobre 2018
du même article : " Les décisions du Conseil constitutionnel ne sont susceptibles d'aucun recours.
CETAT:CETATEXT000037513376
1ère Chambre
DTA_2100082_20230309
9 mars 2023
par le préambule de la Constitution.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621DEC002745005
21 juin 2011
Constitution 19. Article 127 of the Constitution (Constitutional Law no. 460/1992 Coll., as amended) provides: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113DEC000234806
13 novembre 2008
On 1 December 2004, on a complaint by the applicants, the Constitutional Court found that the District Court had violated their right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0710DEC004403905
10 juillet 2007
Constitutional complaint On 30 March 2005, on the applicant’s complaint under Article 127 of the Constitution, the Constitutional Court found that the District Court had violated the applicant