It appears from the documents submitted by the applicant company, the content of which has not been contested in substance by the Government, that legal regulations have been enacted in France and Britain

Brossin de Méré, a lawyer practising in Paris. A.     The circumstances of the case 4.     The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1.

    The case originated in two applications (nos. 15809/02 and 25624/02) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention

    The case originated in an application (no. 13378/05) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

In July and August 2003 the applicant had asked the court to grant him leave to go to the Great-Britain, but that had been refused and since that time he had never tried to leave Russia.

    The case originated in an application (no. 27319/07) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

on 22   December 2008, Having regard to the decision of the Acting Section President of 30   December 2008 to indicate an interim measure to the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain

  The Younger Report (Chapter 5) gave a description of the legal protection available in Great Britain in respect of invasions of privacy and the Government refer to that Chapter and Appendix I to

The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, having been informed by the Registrar of their right to intervene (Article 48, paragraph (b) (art. 48-b), of the Convention and

The case originated in two applications (nos. 9659/82 and 9658/82) lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the first in 1981

It originated in an application (no. 13071/87) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) on 29 September 1986 by Derek Edwards

It originated in an application (no. 22107/93) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) by Mr Alexander Findlay, a British

It originated in an application (no. 21830/93) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) by three British citizens, Mr X, Ms

It originated in an application (no. 16424/90) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) on 11 October 1989 by two British citizens

   The case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights ("the Commission") and by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ("the Government

  22985/93) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission under Article   25 by Miss   Kristina Sheffield, a British national, on 4   August

It originated in an application (no. 24755/94) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission under Article 25 by a British national, Ms Sally McLeod, on 22

It originated in an application (no. 24838/94) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission under Article   25 by five British nationals, Ms Helen Steel

    The case originated in an application (no. 60860/00) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection