By a final judgment of 25 October 2023, the Supreme Court of Georgia, amending a lower court’s judgment, found the applicants’ stepfather guilty of having committed abuses against the second applicant

Lempereur de Guerny ne peut qu'être rejetée selon la procédure prévue à l'article L. 522-3 du code de justice administrative, y compris ses conclusions tendant à l'application de l'article L. 761-1 du

On 9 November 1995 the court-martial found the applicant guilty of four offences contrary to section 69 and of one offence contrary to section 34 of the 1955 Act.

The second applicant was found guilty of aiding and abetting the offences of abuse of office and forgery of public documents. 8.

MILLENIUM AVOCATS, avocats au barreau de PARIS, vestiaire : J143 C/ DEFENDEUR SYNDICAT DES COPROPRIÉTAIRES DE L’IMMEUBLE RÉSIDENCE EOLISS [Adresse 1], représenté par son syndic, la société REGIE GUILLON

– either a not guilty or a guilty verdict form. 5.

during discussions with the other jurors that many of      them were leaning towards a guilty verdict.

  On 19 October 2006 the Oktyabrskiy District Court of Izhevsk found the applicant guilty of aggravated theft and sentenced him to six years of imprisonment.

judgment had been delivered; no suspensive effect of appeal 7,500     25500/20 24/06/2020 Murat Osmanovich DASKIYEV 1949   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow The applicant was found guilty

Before the Court of First Instance, the accused was found guilty, after he had filed a guilty plea, of offences regarding drug trafficking and other related offences, and was condemned to sixteen years

Mr Shadrin pleaded not guilty. He stressed that he had not used any profane words to refer to President Putin.

JUGE DES CONTENTIEUX DE LA PROTECTION DE [Localité 1] --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPELANT [F] [V] Représenté par Me Jean-paul RENAUDIN de la SCP GUILLOU-RENAUDIN

FRANCOFER Représentant : Me Gérald GUILLOT, avocat au barreau de GRASSE Appelante S.A.S.

CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le dix-sept mars mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-dix-neuf, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller GUILLOUX

CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le trente et un mars mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-dix-neuf, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller GUILLOUX

CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le trente octobre mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-seize, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller GUILLOUX

On appeal, the appeal court found the officer guilty of negligent breach of his official duties as he should have temporarily confiscated the gun, but not guilty of grossly negligent homicide, as he had

third parties, the domestic courts had adopted judgments which unambiguously stated that she had committed criminal offences as part of an organised group, despite the fact that she had not been found guilty

After the Administrative Court quashed the Customs Authority’s decision (in which the applicant was found guilty of the charges raised against it) on 14   January 2013 and discontinued the proceeding

The applicant, who was a lieutenant colonel and the executive officer of the battleship TCG Turgutreis, was found guilty, under Article 137 of the Military Criminal Code, of causing significant damage