Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194157
31 mai 2019
31 mai 2019
What steps did the domestic courts take to secure the attendance of that witness before the trial court? 1.b. Was there a good reason for the non-attendance of S.B. at the trial?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194573
17 juin 2019
17 juin 2019
What steps did the domestic courts take to secure the attendance of the witnesses before the trial court?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-182892
16 avril 2018
16 avril 2018
From 27 October until 24 December 2010 the applicant was in pre-trial detention.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214877
9 décembre 2021
9 décembre 2021
’s detention on remand, and thus lifted the pre-trial detention order.
Source officiellecr
61372538cd5801467741bf6a
22 novembre 1989
22 novembre 1989
Trial, président, de M.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-144993
19 mai 2014
19 mai 2014
Under Article 156 of this Code, pre-trial detention during pre-trial investigation shall not last more than two months.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-161744
3 mars 2016
3 mars 2016
On the same day the Nasimi District Court ordered the applicant’s pre ‑ trial detention for a period of three months.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205990
16 octobre 2020
16 octobre 2020
On 29 June 2016 the applicant was committed to trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1961:1219DEC000092060
19 décembre 1961
19 décembre 1961
On ... 1960 the Applicant renewed his request for an immediate trial, but this was rejected by the District Court of C. on ... 1960.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-335
27 octobre 2011
27 octobre 2011
What was required was such a fundamental breach of the fair-trial guarantee as to amount to a destruction of the very essence of that right.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-484
21 juin 2011
21 juin 2011
In 2008 the applicant was convicted of having committed murder by participating in the trial on the basis of the 1852 Criminal Code, applicable at the time of the events.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-230617
11 janvier 2024
11 janvier 2024
in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers who had arrested her during the rally.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0303JUD001637318
3 mars 2026
3 mars 2026
the criminal proceedings against A.İ.Ö. and H.A which contained their pre-trial statements incriminating the applicant and their subsequent retraction of those statements during their own trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0116JUD003129511
16 janvier 2020
16 janvier 2020
The trial judge rejected the application.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016DEC001549910
16 octobre 2012
16 octobre 2012
The trial judge concluded: “32. ...
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0412DEC002637495
12 avril 1996
12 avril 1996
, not a re-trial on damages only.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169417
7 novembre 2016
7 novembre 2016
The applicant twice asked the trial court to summon the expert.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0513DEC001854291
13 mai 1992
13 mai 1992
However the applicant did not ask for an adjournment at the beginning of his trial on the basis that he had had insufficient time to prepare an amended defence even though the trial judge had left
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-174344
19 mai 2017
19 mai 2017
On 27 September 2016 the prosecutor requested the investigating judge of the Amsterdam Regional Court to revoke the suspension of the applicant’s pre-trial detention which related to the
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11476
16 décembre 1999
16 décembre 1999
The trial was conducted with the formality of an adult trial, although certain modifications were made to the procedure in view of the defendants’ age (then eleven): in particular, they were seated next
Source officiellePage 73 sur 1635