The applicant invited the Court to draw conclusions from the Government's unjustified failure to submit the documents from the case file to her or to the Court. B.

    draw on the principles stated in the appendix to this recommendation in the context of ongoing or future educational reforms; b .

I consider that the judges in the court below were entitled to draw upon their experience, and I see no reason in the light of my own experience to disagree with their assessment.” 3.

s      house.

arrested again on 9 March and released on 6 May 2009 ... the Van Military Prosecutor’s indictment charged the applicant with “... hiding and then turning a blind eye to the selling of petroleum and horses

The aim of the picket was to draw attention to the issue of corruption in the prosecution service. The number of possible participants was declared as up to fifty persons.

The applicant pleaded that he was innocent because he had not intended to discredit Mr Sh. but to draw his superiors’ attention to his conduct.

[one of the counsels] to draw up the proposal for exclusion of the records.” 8.

After about half an hour the senior guard, N. arrived, questioned the applicant and drew up a report indicating that the applicant was drunk and “looked untidy”, and that “there was a strong smell of alcohol

In the absence of such an explanation, the Court can draw inferences which may be unfavourable to the Government.

the damage to health, and when special means or a weapon are used, a police officer shall submit a report on the use of physical force, special means or a weapon to his supervisor within twenty-four hours

The home leaves were spent with T. first at his mother’s house and later in his new home. 37.

After an unsuccessful search of the Petrović family’s flat that morning, the police officers left the house together with Mr Petrović in handcuffs. 10.

The Civil Procedure Law clearly provided that the bailiff could only draw up a report on failure to comply with the judgment if the child was not present at the time and place specified.

They had exchanged telephone numbers and had telephoned each other outside of work, as well as during working hours.

    The applicant and his counsel studied the materials of the criminal case (twelve volumes), allegedly, for two hours on 23 December 2006.

       In the case of Re Ashton and Others ([1993] 2 WLR 846) the House of Lords rejected a suggestion that the above proposition in Re Sampson was wrong.

29.12.2007 the [District Court] granted [H.B.’s] claims against [the applicant] and [the applicant’s daughters] ... and obliged [the applicant] and [her daughters] to alienate to [H.B.]the residential house

The restitution of houses and plots of land expropriated against the law of nations should be a given in the now democratic Poland and Czech Republic.” 2.