sitting on 4   October 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Anatoly Kovler, President,   Nina Vajić,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

and sentenced him to one year’s imprisonment since he had authorised for the pillars to be unloaded and left unsecured in the vicinity of the children’s playground, despite the fact that he ought to have

From 6   September to 29   November 2008 the applicant did not have a single opportunity to take a shower. 32.

The hospital, however, refused to admit him because he did not have a valid identity document.

Mr Sh. claimed to have had no knowledge that the applicant and Mr R. had committed the robbery. 15.

Nor have the applicants disputed the fact that the first decisions concerning the port area of Kundziņsala were taken during the constitutional transition period, between 1990 and 1991, by the Supreme

    Under section 5 of the Act a patient in a psychiatric hospital can have a legal representative.

    prohibit the use of a building until noise protection measures have been put in place, 4.

He also sought to have alternative expert examinations conducted.

The court did not specify what procedure the applicant should have followed as an avenue for those complaints. 52.

Reports of the psychologist show that these meetings have been held regularly. 56.

Against this background, this court finds that all the statutory conditions for application of the General Amnesty Act have been met ...” 11.

The ill-treatment and its consequences must have also caused the applicant considerable mental suffering, diminishing his human dignity.

He received very little food and water and did not have access to medical assistance.

Its decision further stated that a representative of this company would have the opportunity to be present during the review of the server by the tax office.

European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

    Proceedings seeking to have the decision declared null and void 48.

The relevant provisions, in so far as they have not been set forth above, provide as follows. 42.

    Both parents have equal parental rights (Article 61 § 1). Parents have a right and an obligation to bring up their children.