CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CR00363
27 mars 2018
Philippe C... était président, M. A... devenant le directeur de l'établissement d'[...] ; que si les contrats de travail de la société A... ont été repris, il est établi que M.
Page 74 sur 75
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0222JUD002603608
22 février 2011
The applicant replied that he had been unaware of the existence of the leave-to-appeal system, which had only come into being some three months before he lodged his appeal.
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:CR00849
20 avril 2017
Philippe C..., - M. D... E..., - M. D... F..., - M. Jacques G..., - M. Philippe H..., - M. Jean-Philippe I..., - Mme Kim MMMMMMMMM... , - M. Yvon J..., - Mme Armel K..., - M. L... M..., - M. B...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1126JUD000631817
26 novembre 2019
Serghides, Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, Alena Poláčková, María Elósegui, Gilberto Felici, Lorraine Schembri Orland, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1201REP003030896
1 décembre 1998
He was represented before the Commission by Mr Philip Leach, a solicitor working for Liberty, London, and by Mr Ben Emmerson and Miss Helen Mountfield, barristers practising in London.
Chambre civile 1-5
69e1c095cdc6046d4787c3be
16 avril 2026
émises ou reçues depuis le 29 mai 2020 jusqu'au 28 mai 2022 et contenant les mots-clés suivants, tant en majuscules qu'en minuscules, au singulier ou au pluriel, avec ou sans ponctuation, seuls ou combinés
613725bfcd58014677420397
11 mai 2000
auparavant, violé le principe, essentiel au procès équitable, du délai raisonnable " ; Attendu que, faute d'avoir été proposé devant les juges du fond, le moyen, mélangé de fait, est nouveau et, comme
6137263dcd580146774240a6
22 novembre 2006
abrogées ; ""qu'en conséquence, les dispositions de l'ancien code des marchés publics, visées par la citation résultant comme le souligne à bon droit Marc X... du décret n 94-334 du 27 avril 1994,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004JUD005443614
4 octobre 2016
Serghides, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 6 September 2016, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD001979614
19 décembre 2017
Helena Jäderblom, President, Branko Lubarda, Luis López Guerra, Dmitry Dedov, Pere Pastor Vilanova, Alena Poláčková, Jolien Schukking, judges, and Stephen Phillips
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0930JUD002366103
30 septembre 2010
Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Renate Jaeger, President, Karel Jungwiert, Rait Maruste, Mark Villiger, Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, Zdravka Kalaydjieva, Ganna Yudkivska, judges, and Stephen Phillips
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0324JUD002491715
24 mars 2020
xa0; Paul Lemmens, President, Helen Keller, Dmitry Dedov, Alena Poláčková, Gilberto Felici, Erik Wennerström, Lorraine Schembri Orland, judges, and Stephen Phillips
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502JUD001082509
2 mai 2017
Serghides, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 4 April 2017, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0123JUD002412506
23 janvier 2014
Zupančič, Ann Power-Forde, Ganna Yudkivska, Helena Jäderblom, Aleš Pejchal, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 17 December
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0514JUD002287693
14 mai 2002
Thereafter, the applicant was represented by Mr Philip Leach, Legal Director of the Kurdish Human Rights Project, London, assisted by Mr Timothy Otty, counsel.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705DEC001793116
5 juillet 2016
Serghides, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 23 March 2016, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0114JUD005111107
14 janvier 2020
Serghides, Helen Keller, Dmitry Dedov, María Elósegui, Gilberto Felici, Erik Wennerström, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207DEC001886019
7 décembre 2021
on grounds of his political opinion but acknowledging the possibility that this was indeed the case, the court found that the 1998 Order “ ... should not be read or given effect in such a way as to compel
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0915JUD004704506
15 septembre 2009
application (no. 47045/06) against Malta lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Maltese national, Mr Philip
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0213JUD000586507
13 février 2018
At the time, the authorities preferred prosecution under Article 19.3 alone or even in combination with Article 20.2 for what were, in substance, the very same factual circumstances. 53.