CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

28 196 résultats pour « Rezad »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002DEC004425210

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2012

2 octobre 2012

The relevant part reads: “Under section 377(1) of the Civil Obligations Act a claim for compensation for damage caused by a criminal offence is time-barred when the statutory limitation period for the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0701JUD002083492

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 1997

1 juillet 1997

   The relevant provisions of the Criminal Code read as follows: Article 111 "1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0313JUD003230313

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2018

13 mars 2018

Section 85 of the ADA reads: “(1)   An appeal on points of law can be lodged: 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0330DEC004974006

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2010

30 mars 2010

(consolidated text), 109/1997, 13/1998, 88/1998, 10/1999, 34/1999, 69/2000, 59/2001 and 82/2001), in force at the material time, read as follows:   II.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1121JUD001688203

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2013

21 novembre 2013

    The relevant extracts from the Constitution of Ukraine of 28 June 1996 read as follows: Article 32 “...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0321DEC002953795

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2002

21 mars 2002

Article 5, insofar as relevant, reads:   “1.     Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0628JUD006573401

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2007

28 juin 2007

in June 2000 he had read from 2 to 50 pages each day.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0623JUD001287587

Admin. suprême

23 juin 1993

23 juin 1993

The refusal to accept blood transfusions is based on several scriptural references, most notably Acts 15: 28-29, which reads (New World translation): "For the holy spirit and we ourselves have favored

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0526DEC002198093

Admin. suprême

26 mai 1997

26 mai 1997

When read as a whole, the statement must be understood to apply not only to one seal, but to several.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0120JUD003881697

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2004

20 janvier 2004

During that time the court heard evidence from 8   witnesses and read out records of evidence taken from 11 witnesses. 47.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1025DEC004798699

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 2005

25 octobre 2005

For that reason, the statements that she had made in the investigation were read out as witness testimony.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103JUD000519309

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2011

3 novembre 2011

    The relevant part of a medical report of 19 July 2006 reads: “The patient is eighty-three years old and in 2000 she suffered an (ischemic) brain stroke.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0114JUD002988904

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2010

14 janvier 2010

During the disciplinary proceedings the president of the court read aloud the written statement of Zdravko Vanjak of 28 May 1996.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0313JUD000560504

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2012

13 mars 2012

The decision taken by the court to read out the statements of the above-mentioned persons is appropriately reasoned, substantiated and correct.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0307JUD003509009

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2017

7 mars 2017

    Article 81 §§ 1 and 2 of the CES reads, in so far as relevant, as follows: “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404JUD003845815

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2017

4 avril 2017

    The relevant part of the explanatory report to the above recommendation reads as follows:   “59.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0509JUD003665805

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2017

9 mai 2017

She relied on Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) of the Convention, which reads as follows in the relevant part: “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0531JUD004990507

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2011

31 mai 2011

    At a hearing held on 16 September 2008 the records of the identification parade (see above, § 10) were read and three witnesses gave evidence. 28.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-196831

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2019

17 septembre 2019

    The relevant part of the text reads as follows: Article 11 – Contracts of employment “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1029JUD005685413

Admin. suprême

29 octobre 2015

29 octobre 2015

  Regulations 17 and 18 read as follows: Regulation 17 “(1) Every request by a prisoner to see the Director, the Board [of Visitors of the Prisons] or a member thereof, and any complaint made by a

Source officielle

Page 74 sur 1410

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.