CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 792 résultats pour « Teffoo »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1114JUD004004211

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2013

14 novembre 2013

  » (§   10) «   Les ténors de l’opposition nationale et d’autres observateurs reprochent au Gouvernement congolais d’avoir entrepris systématiquement de consolider son pouvoir, de circonscrire

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-206000

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2020

16 octobre 2020

Fetullah Gülen, a Turkish citizen living in Pennsylvania (United States of America) and considered to be the leader of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as FETÖ/PDY (“Fetullahist Terror

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1206DEC000853616

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2016

6 décembre 2016

also understands the circumstances in South-Eastern Turkey, where an armed, separatist organisation, recognised as terrorist by the EU, NATO and many countries, has systematically used violence and terror

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619DEC005257715

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2018

19 juin 2018

tortured or treated inhumanly or that serious suffering or injury to the body or health be inflicted; or that [the civilian population] be displaced or resettled; or that measures of intimidation and terror

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1126DEC000331402

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2002

26 novembre 2002

They were suspected of belonging to an illegal association whose aim was to threaten national order and security by means of violence and terror.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0122DEC003124796

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2002

22 janvier 2002

On 11 July 1995 the applicant was taken to the Anti-Terror Branch of the Istanbul Security Directorate.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1018DEC001869691

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 1994

18 octobre 1994

W., in Vienna, pointing out that her car had been set on fire and complaining about the "telephone terror" by the applicant for which reason they now had a confidential number.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223335

Admin. suprême

1 février 2023

1 février 2023

detention of the applicants, who were apparently all judges or prosecutors at the material time, on suspicion of membership of FETÖ/PDY (an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as “Fetullahist Terror

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-220900

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2022

17 octobre 2022

THE CASE The applications mainly concern the applicants’ arrest and pre-trial detention, on suspicion of membership of FETÖ/PDY (an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as “Fetullahist Terror

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0711JUD001434717

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2023

11 juillet 2023

detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15   July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1022JUD002940516

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2019

22 octobre 2019

She concluded that the only explanation for the long wait was that the prosecutor had been trying to intimidate her and induce a state of psychological terror.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1118JUD000303818

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2025

18 novembre 2025

applicants in the aftermath of the attempted coup d’état of 15   July 2016, primarily on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1110DEC002473304

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2009

10 novembre 2009

Court of Cassation quashed the lower court’s judgment, finding that it had made certain clerical errors in the text of its judgment which, taken as a whole, made it impossible to ascertain the exact tenor

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1438399-1511663

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2005

13 septembre 2005

been a violation of Article 6 § 1 in that the applicant had not received a copy of the reporting judge’s report before the hearing, whereas the advocate-general had, and had not been informed of the tenor

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0409JUD000091018

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2026

9 avril 2026

    The reasons for the attack and the situation in which the applicants were attacked, combined with the tenor of the conversation which they allegedly had with the individuals that accosted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0706DEC007115601

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2004

6 juillet 2004

On the basis of the aforesaid, it should be noted without exaggeration that religious minorities in Georgia face permanent danger, intimidation and terror. (...), Jehovah’s Witnesses, (...), have suffered

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0503JUD005875600

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2007

3 mai 2007

    On 24 April 1997 the first, third and fourth applicants were arrested by police officers from the anti-terror Branch of the İzmir police headquarters and placed in custody.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2060373-2194027

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2007

17 juillet 2007

Their cases concerned the length and unlawfulness of their detention in police custody at the anti-terror branch of the relevant security directorate where, according to measures authorised in a state

Source officielle
TA

CHAMBRE 3

DTA_2202793_20251124

Administratif

24 novembre 2025

24 novembre 2025

Par ailleurs, la communauté de communes du Haut-Béarn était lauréate de l’appel à projet « Territoire à Énergie Positive » (TEPOS) lancé par l’Agence de l’environnement et de la maîtrise de l’énergie (

Source officielle
TA

CHAMBRE 3

DTA_2202183_20251124

Administratif

24 novembre 2025

24 novembre 2025

Par ailleurs, la communauté de communes du Haut Béarn était lauréate de l’appel à projet « Territoire à Énergie Positive » (TEPOS) lancé par l’Agence de l’environnement et de la maîtrise de l’énergie (

Source officielle

Page 74 sur 90

← PrécédentSuivant →