The applicants have not informed the Court of any action taken in response to this complaint. 49 .

Kirov Region, who should have been cited as the defendants (see the Supreme Court’s Ruling of 18 August 1992, cited in paragraph 45 above).

    On 7 November 2005 the Moscow deputy prosecutor annulled the above decision and held that the lower prosecutor should have collected more medical evidence and should have commissioned a forensic

    In or around October 2006 the applicant sought statutory compensation payable by the State to individuals who have been acquitted of criminal offences or in respect of whom the charges have

was considered to have successfully defended the remaining 95.7% of the claim.

The President of the Section acceded to the applicant’s request not to have her name disclosed (Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of Court). 2.

Had I known this for sure, I would not have taken him alive. A skunk like that deserves only death!’ ...” 56 .

Had it been so, the presumption of the applicant’s innocence would have been the crucial factor in a decision to dismiss him.

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

station and might have seen the fall.

The Government have submitted observations concerning some of the applications.

Seyran Ayvazyan appears to have been on the porch just outside the main entrance and police officer H.Gev. appears to have been next to him.

In the Government's view, it was impossible to state with certainty that a lesser amount of bail would have secured the same outcome.

that the regime of strict lockdowns was no longer in force, several COVID-19-related restrictions had been altered or eased, indoors and outdoors sports, cultural, entertainment and other events could have

However it does not appear that any further steps have been taken to discover which military units were involved in the incident. 20.

The applicant was a Belarusian national and did not have Russian citizenship. 10.

    The applicants’ attempt to have criminal proceedings instituted against the police officers on account of their unlawful arrest and the alleged violence used against them 19 .

It finds, therefore, that in the proceedings in question, which were criminal in nature, the applicant companies did not have access to a tribunal within the meaning of Article 6 § 1. 34.

The administrative body, following such administrative proceedings, might as well have concluded that no offence had been committed.