The applicant tried to transfer to a different institution in Kherson but had to return to Armyansk because of the gap in curriculum and teaching methods.

Oleksiyivna LEV against Ukraine lodged on 8 June 2018 communicated on 31 July 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns a situation where the proceedings in the applicant’s criminal case are stalled because

The Magistrates’ Court held that the applicant had been taken out of the bar because of her physical appearance and because she had disturbed the other customers but that it had not been proven that the

La demande a été régulièrement communiquée à la commune d'Aveizieux et aux sociétés Services AMO, Beraud Architecture Ingéniérie, Allianz Iard, A2C Sports, BJ Coordination, Ferrand TP, TP Best, Brandmeyer

Sur le rapport de Mme Bessaud, conseiller référendaire, les observations de la SCP Boullez, avocat de la société Ora e-car, après débats en l'audience publique du 28 janvier 2025 où étaient présents M.

Sur le rapport de Mme Bessaud, conseillère référendaire, les observations de la SARL Cabinet François Pinet, avocat de la société GMA, de la SCP Célice, Texidor, Périer, avocat de la société Hakkasan,

They took mobile telephones to Bosnia and Herzegovina because they wanted to send signals to Bjelovar.

communication des documents suivants : 1) le « courrier SANEF » portant sur l'abattage des arbres jugés dangereux ; 2) les résultats d'analyse de « la boulette de viande empoisonnée » ; 3) le « courrier des Beaux-Arts

The hearing on 25 May 2017 was adjourned because of the absence of a judge owing to illness (according to the Government), and because the defence lawyer was also ill.

In particular, he submitted that the proceedings had been lengthy because the trial court had not severed his case from the cases of dozens of other co-defendants and because there had been long delays

They did not know the position of the second applicant’s ex-husband because Talibans did not have positions as in Sweden.

    On 7 October 2002 the hearing was adjourned because the judge was on a mission. On 1 December 2002 the case was transferred to another judge. 12.

The measure applied had not impaired the applicant’s right of access because the first instance judgment was not quashed by the appellate court due to the new legislation, but because the appellate court

He stated that he could not return to Tajikistan because of his Muslim religion since in Tajikistan individuals who prayed, attended mosques, wore a hijab and a beard could be arrested and fined. 10.

She submitted that the costs incurred by the intervener had been unnecessary because the intervention itself had not been necessary.

The head of the department who was responsible for overseeing the compliance with the procedure could not be disciplined because he had retired in 2006.

It also found that the fine was correctly determined because its size was in reference to an offence committed in respect of the tax period ending on 31 December 1997. B.

(b)   The hearing of 12   January 2011 did not take place, because the lawyer of one of the co-accused did not appear before the court.

    Of the seven hearings listed between 3 September 1998 and 6 July 1999, two hearings were adjourned because the defendant did not attend and five hearings were adjourned because the judge