On 5 September 2009 the letter addressed to the applicant’s lawyer was returned, the reason given being that he had died.

At least, one person died as a result of the fire.

    By letter of 9 April 2013, the Government informed the Court that the applicant had died in detention on 26 November 2012 [1] . THE LAW 5.

The applicant immediately took the injured pedestrian to hospital, however the latter died as a result of her injuries.

Direction on the Institution of Proceedings: preliminary objection dismissed   Facts – Relying on Article 2 of the Convention, the applicant complained before the European Court that his brother had died

By letter of 5 January 2012 the applicant’s representative informed the Court that the applicant had died on 20 June 2011.

The representative of Ms Nikolayeva informed the Court that she had died in 2008. No next of kin expressed a wish to take over Ms   Nikolayeva's application.

A police inquiry established that the man with a gun on his shoulder was I.S., member of the Croatian army, who had died in 1997.

In June 2019 the applicant’s son informed the Court that the applicant had died in March 2019.

While it is not clear who of the applicants died, the remaining applicant has not provided any information about the death of his brother or about a change of address where he could be contacted.

From the developments set out above it appears that the applicant died in the course of the proceedings. No heirs or close relatives have expressed the wish to pursue the application on his behalf.

violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life on account of the respondent State’s continuing failure to provide her with credible information as to the fate of her son, who allegedly died

Botyanovskiy died after being hit by a lorry.

On 19 January 2014 the applicant’s daughter, Ms   Yakobashvili, informed the Court that the applicant had died and expressed her wish to pursue the application in the applicant’s stead. 5.

The Government added that the applicant had died on 14   October 2009 and asked the Court to strike the application out of the list of the cases.

He died during his transfer to a State hospital. A preliminary investigation was opened by the public prosecutor the same day. An autopsy was carried out and statements were taken from eyewitnesses.

He informed the Registry that the applicant had died on 30 December 2019 and that his children lived abroad.

The court found that the land had belonged to her father who had died in December 2007.

declared admissible the complaint of the excessive length of certain proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations brought by the applicant before the Court of Audit; Recalling that the applicant died

In March 2008 the applicant’s uncle died. Following his death, A., her uncle’s middle son, registered her as resident in the flat.