CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 619 résultats pour « Isabel WERTER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1127JUD000115710

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2014

27 novembre 2014

Their findings were summarised in a report: “1.

Source officielle

Page 75 sur 131

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616DEC002448813

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2015

16 juin 2015

The applicant was fined in total with 5,754 Croatian kunas (HRK) and the seized firearms were confiscated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD003994806

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2008

18 décembre 2008

No specific details or incidents were given. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0407DEC001607012

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2022

7 avril 2022

Complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. On 20 August 2020 the applicant died.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002DEC004043516

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2018

2 octobre 2018

They were represented before the Court by Dr S. Grech and Dr I. Refalo, lawyers practising in Valletta, Malta. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD001626205

Admin. suprême

19 février 2013

19 février 2013

The complaints were to no avail. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 43.     The Russian legal regulations for detention are explained in the judgment of Isayev v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1126JUD005421508

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2009

26 novembre 2009

Finally, she pointed out that the proceedings were of particular importance to her. 32.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0629DEC002903506

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2010

29 juin 2010

Lastly, the criminal proceedings, which were determinative for the suspension of the disciplinary proceedings, were concluded in an appropriate period of time, taking into account the scope of the issue

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0921DEC001199705

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2010

21 septembre 2010

The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr. V.A. Schorm, from the Ministry of Justice. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2013

9 juillet 2013

Two knives were found at the scene, one of which had a broken blade. 18.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD003996402

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2008

13 novembre 2008

The police were allegedly called, but the applicants explained that they were the owners of the house and the police left.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1125DEC000878304

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2008

25 novembre 2008

On 23   February   2002 criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD004182405

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2012

26 juin 2012

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0329JUD003407802

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2010

29 mars 2010

    The applicants were represented by Mr P.   Blondel, of the Conseil d'Etat and Court of Cassation Bar.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0730JUD003439303

Admin. suprême

30 juillet 2009

30 juillet 2009

No hygiene facilities were provided.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2015

16 juin 2015

They were represented by their Agent, Mr Ç. Asgarov. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0626JUD003942812

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2014

26 juin 2014

    The applicants were represented by Mr E. Mezak, a lawyer practising in Syktyvkar. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD001715311

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2014

25 mars 2014

The said municipalities were apparently chosen because of their “underdeveloped” status, implying the reservists’ indigence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1007DEC002236704

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2008

7 octobre 2008

Therefore, the latter were not a party to the proceedings and thus not excluded from them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0414DEC000293004

Admin. suprême

14 avril 2009

14 avril 2009

In November 2001 the criminal proceedings for abduction were stayed. They were resumed in October 2004 for the questioning of a new witness and stayed again in December 2005.

Source officielle