CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1127JUD000115710
27 novembre 2014
Their findings were summarised in a report: “1.
Page 75 sur 131
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616DEC002448813
16 juin 2015
The applicant was fined in total with 5,754 Croatian kunas (HRK) and the seized firearms were confiscated.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD003994806
18 décembre 2008
No specific details or incidents were given. 12.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0407DEC001607012
7 avril 2022
Complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. On 20 August 2020 the applicant died.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002DEC004043516
2 octobre 2018
They were represented before the Court by Dr S. Grech and Dr I. Refalo, lawyers practising in Valletta, Malta. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD001626205
19 février 2013
The complaints were to no avail. II. RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 43. The Russian legal regulations for detention are explained in the judgment of Isayev v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1126JUD005421508
26 novembre 2009
Finally, she pointed out that the proceedings were of particular importance to her. 32.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0629DEC002903506
29 juin 2010
Lastly, the criminal proceedings, which were determinative for the suspension of the disciplinary proceedings, were concluded in an appropriate period of time, taking into account the scope of the issue
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0921DEC001199705
21 septembre 2010
The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr. V.A. Schorm, from the Ministry of Justice. A.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909
9 juillet 2013
Two knives were found at the scene, one of which had a broken blade. 18.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD003996402
13 novembre 2008
The police were allegedly called, but the applicants explained that they were the owners of the house and the police left.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1125DEC000878304
25 novembre 2008
On 23 February 2002 criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD004182405
26 juin 2012
The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0329JUD003407802
29 mars 2010
The applicants were represented by Mr P. Blondel, of the Conseil d'Etat and Court of Cassation Bar.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0730JUD003439303
30 juillet 2009
No hygiene facilities were provided.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605
They were represented by their Agent, Mr Ç. Asgarov. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0626JUD003942812
26 juin 2014
The applicants were represented by Mr E. Mezak, a lawyer practising in Syktyvkar. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD001715311
25 mars 2014
The said municipalities were apparently chosen because of their “underdeveloped” status, implying the reservists’ indigence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1007DEC002236704
7 octobre 2008
Therefore, the latter were not a party to the proceedings and thus not excluded from them.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0414DEC000293004
14 avril 2009
In November 2001 the criminal proceedings for abduction were stayed. They were resumed in October 2004 for the questioning of a new witness and stayed again in December 2005.