CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0527JUD001861104
27 mai 2010
    The Court notes that the final decision of 15 May 2002 upheld the journalist's acquittal of the criminal charges, leaving unchanged the outcome of the criminal head of the proceedings.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0406JUD001799209
6 avril 2021
    The applicant company maintained further that, due to the fact that the third company with which it had the litigation leading to the present case had destroyed the access platform to the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0516JUD007837511
16 mai 2017
This investigation should be capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013JUD000737703
13 octobre 2009
In particular, it gave consideration to the statements naming the applicant as one of the leading members of the organisation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1215JUD002091321
15 décembre 2022
    In the leading case of Balogh and Others (cited above, § 70), the Court has already found a violation of Article 6 of the Convention given an excessive length of the proceedings. 26.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0311JUD002574217
11 mars 2021
    In the leading case of Dirdizov v.   Russia, no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0113JUD001309419
13 janvier 2022
However, it should, in principle, be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD005506418
10 novembre 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0602JUD001255209
2 juin 2016
However, it should in principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and to the identification and punishment of those responsible.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1206JUD005443008
6 décembre 2018
The Court finds that, as in the leading judgment, the debtor enterprises in the instant case did not enjoy sufficient institutional and operational independence from the authorities, and the State is to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0330JUD006568812
30 mars 2017
    The Court observes that the present case is of the type it examined in the leading case of Velikovi and Others (cited above) and a number of follow-up cases (see, for example, Dimitar and
Chambre 3-1
696a9ae4cdc6046d4792564f
15 janvier 2026
LA BANQUE POSTALE LEASING & FACTORING C/ Société MULTARI PRODUCTION S.A.S. JV AGENIAA S.A. BPCE LEASE S.A.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1130DEC006170913
30 novembre 2021
    On 11 December 2009 the Prahova County Court replaced the measure with a ban on leaving the country.
Service des référés
65aacc800c777d3ec8eb6311
19 janvier 2024
DE LAGE LANDEN LEASING [Adresse 1] [Adresse 1] [Localité 4] représentée par Maître Ambroise DE PRADEL DE LAMAZE de la SELARL Ambroise de PRADEL de LAMAZE Avocat, avocats au barreau de PARIS - C0624
1ère chambre
DTA_2502621_20250930
30 septembre 2025
Pipart, rapporteur public, - et les observations de Me Lelong, représentant M. et Mme A....
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1106JUD006207708
6 novembre 2018
    In his statement taken at the Samandıra police station on 20   November 2007 the applicant told the police that his sons had apparently not gone to school after leaving home the previous
Tribunal Administratif de Montreuil
DTA_2302890_20230329
29 mars 2023
l'exécution de la décision du 12 janvier 2023 par laquelle le président de l'établissement public territorial (EPT) Plaine Commune a exercé son droit de préemption urbain sur des biens situés 18 avenue Lénine
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630JUD003729104
30 juin 2009
Furthermore, the first-instance court never considered a different preventive measure, such as a prohibition on leaving the country or release on bail, instead of maintaining the applicant’s detention
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0112JUD001028807
12 janvier 2017
    In the leading cases of Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, 9 November 2004 and Efimenko v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1105JUD000823706
5 novembre 2015
    In the leading cases of Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, 9 November 2004, and Efimenko v.
Page 75 sur 1642