CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0129JUD005574908
29 janvier 2015
Between 11 a.m. and 1.40 p.m. on 19 March 2004 the applicant was questioned as a witness in the murder case.
Page 75 sur 819
cr
61372546cd5801467741c657
28 octobre 1992
édités en vidéo-cassettes, dites "cassettes pirates" ; que Lucien X..., gestionnaire bénévole de ce vidéo-club, a expressément reconnu que d l'association n'ayant pas les moyens financiers d'acheter
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0708JUD000065910
8 juillet 2021
In the case of Bandura v.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177330
8 septembre 2017
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. On 2 July 2006 the applicant’s husband, Mr J.
ECLI:CEDH:001-149167
3 décembre 2014
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.
ECLI:CEDH:001-242804
17 mars 2025
Sweden [GC], no. 43611/11, §§ 110-16, 23 March 2016; K.I. v. Russia , no. 58182/14, §§ 25-28, 7 November 2017; and T.K. and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607JUD003598097
7 juin 2001
On 30 March 2001 the Court received the formal declaration, dated 23 March 2001, from the applicants’ representative accepting a friendly settlement of the case.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0205DEC004031211
5 février 2019
On 21 March 2018 Law no. 7103 was enacted; it was published in the Official Gazette on 27 March 2018. Section 23 of Law no.
ECLI:CEDH:001-147141
16 septembre 2014
On 2 March 2010 at 2 pm I. called his mother and told her that he and M. had met with a psychologist and that everything came back to order.
ECLI:CEDH:001-111795
31 mai 2012
The interim measure applied on 15 March 2012 was lifted on 31 May 2012.
ECLI:CEDH:001-170258
14 décembre 2016
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10360
5 février 2015
That conclusion derived from the applicable domestic legal provisions was corroborated by reference to the scope and nature of the “examination” actually carried out by the Supreme Court in March 2008
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1128JUD003740418
28 novembre 2023
In the case of Oğuz v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-114698
31 août 2011
ECLI:CEDH:001-169758
23 novembre 2016
In the meantime, between 28 February and 7 March 2014, the anti-terrorist squad carried out exercises to prepare for the operation. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0705JUD006800701
5 juillet 2007
The fifth man was questioned in March 2001. According to the Government, on 17 March 2001 the applicant was questioned and granted victim status.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0622JUD002259716
22 juin 2021
In its judgment of 20 March 2002 in case no. 3-1-1-25-02 the Supreme Court found that a failure to inform a suspect or witness of their right not to incriminate themselves or their next of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108JUD007680511
8 novembre 2016
In March and April 2007 the police investigator carried out the additional investigative measures ordered by the district prosecutor (see paragraph 19 above). 24.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0723JUD001006007
23 juillet 2015
In the case of Bataliny v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD003776212
26 avril 2016
In the case of Milanković and Bošnjak v.