CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0722JUD002808308
22 juillet 2021
They also argued that the Yasamal District Court had wrongly shifted the burden of proof by requesting them to present evidence in support of their accusations against J.A., whereas it was the latter’s
Page 75 sur 6767
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0108DEC001783991
8 janvier 1992
They submitted that in view of their young age and their common background they should be enabled to reside together, and that their financial means only allowed them to visit each other every eight
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0531JUD002516594
31 mai 2005
On 8 March 1994 the five men were questioned by a judge at the Diyarbakır Court. The judge then ordered the release of four of them.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0314DEC003227096
14 mars 2002
Before the Justice of the Peace of that Chamber, the applicants denied the accusations against them and complained that they had made their statements under torture.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5068
5 décembre 2002
Between these attempts to deport them, and following their return from Tunis, the applicants, who were regarded as undesirables on Polish territory, were held by the immigration authorities at Warsaw
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1218JUD001612605
18 décembre 2007
own name but that they were acting through the intermediary of their mother. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129DEC003573197
29 janvier 2002
They were of the opinion that it was not possible to discuss the matter with Mr and Mrs Venema, there being a danger that they might react unpredictably.
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68157-68625
28 juin 2000
Finally, on 10 June 1992 when their mother demanded that the children be taken into care or she would batter them, the children were placed in emergency foster care.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0522JUD001755003
22 mai 2008
We did not accept the offer because the tanks had been offered for free. Had we agreed to take these tanks, there would have been no commissions - and then what would happen to the casinos?” 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0603DEC004113898
3 juin 2003
One police car even pursued the applicant and other Roma trying to return to their homes, firing shots at them from their police car and shouting at them to leave the village.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0702DEC002527994
2 juillet 1997
The fact that the [magistrates' clerk]'s affidavit is silent as to whether the justices considered this course leads me to think that they misdirected themselves and that their decision ... was flawed.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13480
18 novembre 2021
they had been apprised of the decisions placing them in the Centre in a language they could understand.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0608JUD000837207
8 juin 2021
They did not specify the reason for their failure to do so. Media coverage of the applicant’s trial 29.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0315JUD000905118
15 mars 2022
They also claimed compensation in the amount of EUR 18,000 in respect of pecuniary damage for their inability to use and enjoy the compensation due to them for many years.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1211DEC000487002
11 décembre 2007
They finally submitted under this head that the periodicals found in their homes had been legal publications.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0618JUD007476810
18 juin 2019
The latter had started insulting the workers and the men in black. They had had then started to push A. and K., grabbing their arms, trying to seize their chainsaws.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0330DEC003944498
30 mars 2000
When they entered the room, they found the victim asleep and put a pillow over her head to prevent her from screaming, and then they raped her.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0511DEC002381094
11 mai 1994
the meaning of this provision did not affect adult children and their relations with their parents.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1201DEC002516594
1 décembre 1997
The soldiers assaulted these six persons in front of the rest of the villagers and then took them out of the sight of the villagers.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707DEC005614815
7 juillet 2020
they had proposed and had not allowed them access to the case file.