Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-237744
20 mars 2023
20 mars 2023
In his written statements submitted to the Higher court, the applicant claimed, inter alia, that he had to ask for a 5 minutes’ break during the trial, so that the “heated passions of the trial judge calm
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0701DEC000767606
1 juillet 2008
1 juillet 2008
a reasonable time or to release pending trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-122085
4 juin 2013
4 juin 2013
In doing so, the Regional Court mainly relied on the trial statements of the victim’s successor and the pre-trial statements of eleven witnesses.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0317DEC003059622
17 mars 2026
17 mars 2026
All subsequent notifications in the proceedings regarding developments in the trial (bill of indictment, notification of the trial, the dates and place of the trial hearings and the date
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605DEC004643509
5 juin 2012
5 juin 2012
The investigation of the applicants’ case and the trial 15.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111124
18 avril 2012
18 avril 2012
The trial court read out Ms D.’s pre-trial statements despite the applicant’s and his lawyer’s objections to that effect, having excused Ms D. from appearing in open court.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193410
2 mai 2019
2 mai 2019
On 20 April 2009 Leninskyy District Court of Sevastopol ordered her pre-trial detention.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-238821
29 novembre 2024
29 novembre 2024
(b) Was the applicants’ pre-trial detention compatible with the requirements of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704JUD003965510
4 juillet 2017
4 juillet 2017
time or to release pending trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512DEC001489904
12 mai 2005
12 mai 2005
s statements because he had not had any procedural status in the applicant's trial and that the trial court failed to secure the attendance of the witness I.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-227939
7 septembre 2023
7 septembre 2023
in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229915
30 novembre 2023
30 novembre 2023
in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based 4980/22*
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1017DEC003189696
17 octobre 2000
17 octobre 2000
within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510DEC003399207
10 mai 2012
10 mai 2012
The Regional Court had therefore had to postpone the trial and to stay the proceedings as long as the applicant was unfit for trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224172
14 mars 2023
14 mars 2023
By decisions of 16 May, 16 August and 9 December 2022 the Riga City Court decided to prolong the applicant’s pre-trial detention.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217432
26 avril 2022
26 avril 2022
In the trial proceedings, in which he was sentenced to life imprisonment, the applicant was represented by a lawyer appointed by his family.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0607JUD001518703
7 juin 2007
7 juin 2007
judge prior to, or during, the trial. 14.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1112JUD004028806
12 novembre 2015
12 novembre 2015
, justify his release pending trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204782
31 août 2020
31 août 2020
At the time of introduction of this application the applicant was still detained pending trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205992
15 octobre 2020
15 octobre 2020
On 3 February 2016 the Court of Cassation upheld the trial court’s judgment.
Source officiellePage 75 sur 1635