ARTICLE 6 § 2 OF THE CONVENTION Complaint not repeated before the Court —   no need for the Court to address the matter of its own motion (unanimously). III.

Court.

He also took part in a working session attended by the Presidents and members of the Court of Cassation and the Consiglio di Stato , in the course of which the issues of implementation of the Pinto Act

LA COUR DE CASSATION, DEUXIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par : 1°/ Madame Alphonsine X..., née Y..., 2°/ Monsieur René, Joseph X..., 3°/ Monsieur Marcel, Félix

In reply, the Court informed the Government that the conditions that they had attached to the Court’s access to those documents and the manner they had proposed for the Court to proceed were not in accordance

(Al Qaeda); a further two counts charge him with conspiracy to the main two counts. 15.

  Necessary in a democratic society Major principles in Court's case-law recalled.

Sweden - 14282/88 Judgment 25.11.1993 Article 6 Article 6-1 Access to court Civil rights and obligations Lack of access to court to challenge the granting of a refuse-dumping permit to a company on neighbouring

On 7   January 2002 a district court convicted him and ordered him to undergo in-patient psychiatric treatment.

Final point: the date of the Supreme Court's rejection of the applicant's second appeal on points of law. Total: four years, four months and one day. B.

In the indictment (including charge no. 2.2) K. also demanded punishment of the applicant on five counts of alleged false denunciation and five counts of alleged libel.

The Nizami District Court concluded that the Commission failed to answer its questions and left the matter to the court’s discretion and, therefore, disregarded the opinions of 1 March 2010, 2 April 2010

    On 31 July 2008 the Trier Regional Court convicted the applicant of two counts of drug trafficking in not insignificant amounts while carrying a weapon and another count of drug trafficking

The court relied on, inter alia : (i) the applicant’s admissions in the course of the trial; (ii) the victim’s court testimony, denying, in particular, having borrowed any money from the applicant, as

Judgment of the Court of 18 March 1986.#European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium.#Case C-85/85.

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 May 1973.#Campogrande v European Commission.#Case C-60/72.

Judgment of the Court of 15 June 1976.#John Mills v European Investment Bank.#Case C-110/75.

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 July 1980.#Moat v European Commission.#Case C-103/79.

CIV. 2 LG COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Audience publique du 16 décembre 2016 Cassation Mme FLISE, président Arrêt n° 1848 FS-P+B+I Pourvoi n° M 15-26.083

Judgment of the Court - 14 April 2016#Netherlands Maritime Technology Association v Commission#Case C-100/15 P