On the way, the applicant’s son fell to the ground and was taken to a hospital where he died the same day.

He died on 21 January 2013 and the applicant’s son, Mr Igor Nakovski, expressed his intention to pursue the application on behalf of his late father.

violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life on account of the respondent State’s continuing failure to provide her with credible information as to the fate of her son, who allegedly died

Section IV] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Removal of organs for transplantation without knowledge or consent of closest relatives: violation Facts – In 2002 the applicant’s adult son died

Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for home Forced eviction of Roma families and destruction of their homes with no offer of alternative accommodation: violation Facts – The 33 applicants, six of whom have died

The Government submitted that on 2 May 2003 the applicant had died. COMPLAINT The applicant complained that the judgment of the Taganrog Town Court of 7 October 1999 had not been executed.

  Summary of the facts     Although Greek law provided for the election of the Muslim religious leaders, the muftis, by the members of the minority in Thrace, when the mufti of Rodopi died

On 4 January 2016 he died in that prison, according to the authorities, by committing suicide by hanging.

  Complaints   The applicants complain that, when one of them died, the survivor would face a heavy inheritance tax bill, unlike the survivor of a marriage or a civil partnership.

The first two applicants are the parents, the third applicant is the brother and the fourth applicant is the sister of Mr Sinan Karadeniz, who died on 18 September 2006.

Their aunt, who had acquired Turkish nationality by marriage, died in 1984 without issue.

By letter dated 13 June 2015, the applicant’s husband, Mr Oleg Volodymyrovych Chaykovskyy, informed the Registry that his wife had died on 3 February 2012 and he expressed his wish to pursue the application

He died three months after the operation from the consequences of septicaemia caused by peritonitis and hollow viscera perforation.

Dzhugashvili case, the present case had not focused on the reputation of a world-famed public figure, but rather had dealt with the reputation of a twenty-one-year-old military army private who had died

On 4 February 2008 the Government submitted to the Registry their observations on the admissibility and merits of the application, in which they informed the Court that the applicant had died on 28 June

On 5 March 2008 the Court decided to communicate the applicants’ complaint concerning the length of pension proceedings during which the would-be pensioner, Mrs M., died.

The applicant's wife died on 14 February 1993.

The applicant’s father died on 5 February 2015 and she is his lawful heir.

On 21 April 2021 the Government made a request to restore the application to the Court’s list of cases, as during the enforcement of the Court’s decision they had learned that the applicant had died on

Protocol No. 11, declared admissible the complaint relating to the excessive length of certain proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before the Court of Audit; Recalling that the applicant died