CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0310JUD004132617
10 mars 2022
The questioning took place on 5 February 2018. 29.
Page 76 sur 2955
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0524JUD007014201
24 mai 2007
February 2001.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112JUD000291502
12 janvier 2010
First attempt by the authorities to have the judgment of 8 February 1995 revised 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0203JUD003994107
3 février 2011
from 23 February 1998 to 17 January 2003 (date of delivery of this judgment).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1009JUD004619313
9 octobre 2014
27 February.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0604DEC003880497
4 juin 2002
He sent his further letters to the court on 4 November 1997, and 2 and 16 February 1998.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0515JUD005438209
15 mai 2018
842 was issued on 7 February 1999. That would mean that 842 orders were issued from the beginning of 1999 until 7 February 1999.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207462
8 décembre 2020
On 5 February 2009, upon the local prosecutor’s appeal in cassation, the Higher Administrative Court (“the HAC”) quashed the judgments of 19 February and 10 July 2007 on the grounds
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1005JUD003380496
5 octobre 2000
Ferrari Bravo, the judge elected in respect of San Marino, to sit in his place (Article 27 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 29 § 1). 5.
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2024:103
1 février 2024
Sentenza della Corte (Decima Sezione) del 1° febbraio 2024.#Scania AB e a. contro Commissione europea.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-68992
25 avril 2005
uppercase } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2005)31 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 5 February
ECLI:CEDH:001-76222
21 juin 2006
uppercase } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2006)42 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 10 February
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0331DEC001319113
31 mars 2015
The complaint was communicated to the Government on 14 February 2014.
ECLI:CEDH:001-242509
27 février 2025
Albania , no. 15227/19, 9 February 2021, Besnik Cani v. Albania , no. 37474/20, 4 October 2022, Sevdari v. Albania , no. 40662/19, 13 December 2022, Nikëhasani v.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-52211
26 février 2001
II against France (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 26 February 2001 at the 741 st meeting of the Ministers' Deputies) The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of former
ECLI:CEDH:001-248754
22 janvier 2026
On 9 February 2018 a deportation order was issued against the applicant.
ECLI:CEDH:001-223411
10 février 2023
2023 SECOND SECTION Application no. 471/19 JURUKOSKI SEKO DOOEL against North Macedonia lodged on 20 December 2018 communicated on 10 February 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0205DEC005904019
5 février 2026
width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 59040/19 Marcin DEJNEKA against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 5 February
ECLI:CEDH:001-49578
7 juin 1995
#xa0; Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 27 February
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0316DEC003373896
16 mars 1999
The relevant judgment was served on the applicant on 3 February 1993. The applicant was suspended from his duties between 4 February 1993 and 3 February 1994.