By a judgment of 20 April 2007, the Assize Court found the applicant guilty as charged on all counts under criminal case no. 76932, and sentenced him to eleven years’ imprisonment with confiscation of

The sludge was to be carried in lorries, with between six and eleven runs from the Plovdiv plant to the pond per day.

Medical ward of the remand prison: skin injury in the area of right hip and chest, haematoma on the right shin, chin injury, handcuffing traces.

This latter submission sits ill with the following passage in the judgment of the Lord Chief Justice: ‘They [Laskey and Cadman] recruited new participants; they jointly organised proceedings at the house

At the hearing he gave evidence over fourteen days, during eleven of which he was cross-examined by counsel for the first applicant.

Following a complaint by the applicant, the Chief Prosecutor’s Office decided that the prohibition was no longer necessary and authorised phone contacts under the supervision of the Public Prosecutor’s

Those documents also indicated that on 07/03/09 police removed applicant from hospital without consulting chief doctor and before completion of treatment (ii)     07/04/09 - report no.

Tsentralno-Miskyy district police inspector); (iii)     27/07/10 – applicant released after having served his sentence; (iv)     28/07/10 – decision on deporting applicant from Ukraine (Chief

He submitted that the organisational hierarchy of this structure was as follows: the most senior individual was the chief regional student supervisor (“ Büyük Bölge Sorumlusu ”); he was responsible for

The remaining eleven persons, including the fourth applicant, were arrested on administrative-offence charges of minor hooliganism and resisting the lawful orders of the police (see paragraph   17

    On 2 December 2016 the Petrozavodsk police department received an anonymous letter alleging that the applicant had been taking nude photographs of his eleven-year-old adopted daughter, N.

The investigation was conducted by the investigative unit of the Chief Prosecutor’s Office (subsequently renamed the General Prosecutor’s Office). 18.

On 11 August 1998 the Chief Enforcement Officer, without adducing any reasons, refused the applicant’s request for a further postponement of the execution of his previously ordered prison sentence.

    On 9 December 2013 a prosecutor of the Prosecutor General’s Office requested the Chief of the Russian Investigation Committee to decide on the issue of criminal prosecution in the case concerning

Military servicemen conducted regular identity checks in the village; prior to the events in question they had visited the applicants' house for identity checks on eleven occasions. 11.

the ten separate applications against the Republic of Serbia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by eleven

The decision concerned eleven defendants.

    The applicant complained that the proceedings took eleven years to reach their conclusion.

Rotureau , Chief Inspector of Customs,     Strasbourg Regional Head Office of Customs,   Counsel ; - for the Commission   Mr S.

    On 30 October 2008 the DEJA, in reply to the applicant’s applications, reiterated to the Minister of Justice and the Chief Compulsory Enforcement Officer its earlier-stated position that,