On 3 October 2016 the Georgian Young Lawyers Association (hereafter “GYLA”) approached the SSSG on behalf of the applicants, inquiring into the progress of the investigation.

She also acts on behalf of her children, G., aged thirteen, who has dual Belgian and Italian nationality, and M., aged six and who has Italian nationality.

      The first applicant has lodged several complaints both on his own behalf and on behalf of his minor son.

    At a hearing held on 31 January 2012 the Zagreb Municipal Civil Court heard evidence from the applicant who said that he had authorised his representative to act on his behalf vis-à-vis the

    On 20 April 2005 the applicant brought an action for fraudulent conveyance ( actio pauliana ), on behalf of the minor T.D. and on his behalf, before the Sofia City Court against LDC and companies

    Under Section 93 of the code of civil procedure, a lawyer whose client is of poor means can declare to have advanced the costs and expenses of the proceedings on behalf of his client and

violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the applicant’s allegation that her husband was abducted and killed by State agents or people acting on behalf

of Appeal, the Government maintain that their length is due to the conduct of the applicant, who failed to correctly identify the witnesses which, according to the Government, were examined on his behalf

On 6 November 2008 the Diyarbakır Public Prosecutor issued an indictment charging the applicant with committing a crime on behalf of an illegal organisation without being a member, under Article 314 of

It was after the notification of the Government’s request for revision that the heirs of the deceased applicants came forward and expressed the wish to pursue the proceedings on those applicants’ behalf

The application was brought on his behalf by his mother. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.

    Accordingly, the Court decides that Mr Dávid-Adrian Fînaţi and Ms   Rebeka Fînaţi have standing to continue the proceedings on behalf of late Mr   Fînaţi to whom it will continue

Therefore, the second applicant joined, on behalf of his minor daughter a civil complaint to the criminal proceedings for material and moral damages.

        On 13 December 1993 the Ombudsman filed an extraordinary appeal on the applicant's behalf with the Supreme Court (S*d Najwyzszy), claiming that the impugned decision

October 1986 the Secretary of State refused the applicant's renewal of leave in the following terms: -             "(Your) solicitors ... have applied on your behalf

further complains that he was deprived of his right to examine the witnesses against him before the Baku Court of Appeal and that he could not obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf

33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII, and Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511/10, § 79, ECHR 2016, with further references), the Court accepts that Mrs Stojanović has standing to pursue the application on behalf

The Court noted in that regard that Ms   C. had consented to publication on her own behalf and on behalf of her son.

The applicant’s wife, Mrs   Oksana Mykhaylivna Malevych, has requested to pursue the application on her husband’s behalf.

  A reply on behalf of the applicant was submitted on 3 November 1988.