CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

16 369 résultats pour « Marc CASSIEDE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5715

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2001

12 avril 2001

In March 1990 the State appealed on points of law to the Supreme Administrative Court.

Source officielle

Page 77 sur 819

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5032

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2003

14 janvier 2003

  It contended that these changes in the law meant that work of general interest could now be carried out on land previously excluded from the flooding zone.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2789

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2007

6 mars 2007

In particular the Government had given no explanation to justify the need for handcuffs in the present case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1599

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2009

31 mars 2009

No. 117 March 2009 Wiktorko v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-219245

Admin. suprême

25 août 2022

25 août 2022

To substantiate its counterclaim, the creditor submitted a report of its business account carried out by the auditors confirming the existence of the debt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-209420

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2021

26 mars 2021

font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline }   Published on 12 April 2021   SECOND SECTION Application no. 59/17 Aydın Sefa AKAY against Turkey lodged on 21 December 2016 communicated on 26 March

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244239

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2025

20 juin 2025

Spain , no. 57020/18, §   30, 8 March 2022)?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9943

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2014

17 juin 2014

The authorities had therefore taken all the necessary measures to shed light on the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11780

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2017

19 décembre 2017

Union case of Bundesrepublik Deutschland v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1695

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2009

15 janvier 2009

On 15 March 2006 the Municipal Court had found M.M. guilty of repeatedly threatening to kill himself, M.T. and their child with a bomb.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0628DEC003778308

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2016

28 juin 2016

The case concerned, in particular, the allegedly unlawful nature of a number of searches carried out in the applicants’ homes and offices in 1999.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-148601

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2014

13 novembre 2014

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-123864

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2013

9 juillet 2013

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-590

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2011

29 mars 2011

No. 139 March 2011 Uzan and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245578

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2025

23 septembre 2025

In both cases the compensation was based on the provisions of the Regulation on the calculation of the value of agricultural land (see, for more detail on it, Kostov and Others , cited above, §§ 30-32)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10911

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2015

15 septembre 2015

However, this reasoning did not apply in the present case, in which the events had occurred considerably later.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243905

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2025

28 mai 2025

Published on 16 June 2025   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 50141/20 Vitaliy Vitaliyovych OSTROLUTSKYY against Ukraine lodged on 5 November 2020 communicated on 28 May 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55588

Admin. suprême

9 juin 1994

9 juin 1994

Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the Miailhe case

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216973

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2022

25 mars 2022

What are the rules on dealing with children should the adult they were accompanying be arrested, and have any such rules been followed in the second applicant’s case?   3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244034

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2025

3 juin 2025

On 29 June 2017 X became a suspect in the case and 27 August 2019 he was indicted with manslaughter.

Source officielle