CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002296193
15 mai 1996
The applicant was summoned by a standard-form letter entitled 'Personal summons of the accused to trial'.
Page 77 sur 1635
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0615JUD006095800
15 juin 2004
trial.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD000225712
12 décembre 2017
use of her pre-trial testimony for his conviction.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0209JUD007332916
9 février 2021
THE APPLICANT’S ARREST AND PRE-TRIAL DETENTION 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD004261506
9 juillet 2013
detainee and, in accordance with the Law on Pre-trial Detention, detainees had to be held in a pre-trial detention facility.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3440
1 mars 2006
Before his arrest he had not received any official information about the charges or the date of his trial.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-120331
6 mai 2013
On 14 January 2009 the appellate court remitted the case to the trial court for fresh consideration.
ECLI:CEDH:002-387
13 septembre 2011
In rejecting her application for costs following her acquittal, the trial judge explained that by refusing to answer questions before her trial, in particular regarding what on the face of it was an incriminating
ECLI:CEDH:001-202681
16 avril 2020
Did the applicant’s placement in a glass cabin during the trial amount to degrading treatment proscribed by Article 3 of the Convention?
ECLI:CEDH:001-146903
8 septembre 2014
his pre-trial detention and about the excessive length of his detention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-193701
16 mai 2019
It held that the applicant’s pre ‑ trial detention between 21 March and 20 June 2005 had been “undoubtedly unjustified” as the applicant had been acquitted.
TRIBUNAL_UE
ECLI:EU:T:2025:1
8 janvier 2025
#Fresh Tropical Srl by Jawad versus Euroopa Liidu Intellektuaalomandi Amet.
ECLI:CEDH:001-228459
5 octobre 2023
in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
ECLI:CEDH:001-229768
30 novembre 2023
2ème chambre - formation à 3
DCA_25LY00281_20260115
15 janvier 2026
B..., représentée par Me Trorial, demande à la cour : 1°) d’annuler ce jugement en tant qu’il a rejeté le surplus de sa demande ; 2°) d’annuler cet arrêté ; 3°) d’enjoindre au préfet de la Côte-d
3e chambre - formation à 3
DCA_24DA02228_20251105
5 novembre 2025
B..., représentée par Me Trorial, demande à la cour : 1°) d’annuler le jugement n° 2402047 du 30 septembre 2024 en tant qu’il n’a fait que partiellement droit à sa demande ; 2°) d’annuler l’arrêté
6e Section - 3e Chambre
DTA_2220830_20230406
6 avril 2023
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire, enregistrés les 7 octobre 2022 et 19 janvier 2023, Mme D E, représentée par Me Trorial, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 30
ECLI:CEDH:001-193412
2 mai 2019
62209/17 In the course of the pre-trial investigation against the applicant the bill of indictment was submitted to the trial court and returned to the prosecutor for corrections a number of times
ECLI:CEDH:001-156315
26 juin 2015
On an unspecified date the criminal case was referred to the first-instance court for trial.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC001306521
6 octobre 2022
Everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 (c) of this Article shall be ... entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.