Y... à qui la désignation litigieuse avait pourtant été notifiée, ce dont il résultait que le délai de forclusion n'avait pas couru en l'espèce ; qu'en faisant courir le délai de forclusion en fonction

not to expel the applicant to Rwanda (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court).

The courts repeated the grounds previously given for the applicant’s continued detention. 15.     On 30 June 2010 the Gliwice Regional Court gave judgment.

  Whether there was a dispute ( contestation ) over a "right" Recapitulation of Court's case-law - point not contested in instant case. B.

of Western Thrace for disturbing peace during election campaign by distributing leaflets referring to that community as "Turkish": preliminary objection allowed [This summary is extracted from the Court’s

Après qu’il a eu fait courir deux de ses juments dans des courses de niveau Classe 2 organisées à l’hippodrome de Deauville, la jument « Passion intense » le 10 décembre 2021 et la jument « Caprice de

By judgment of the District Court of Reykjavík of 26 June 2015, the applicant was convicted on six counts of fraud by abuse of position, but acquitted on one count, namely concerning the Holt Investment

The applicant lodged a claim for damages jointly against the Sofia City Court and the Sofia Court of Appeal for the missing items.

In reply, the Court informed the Government that the conditions that they had attached to the Court’s access to those documents and the manner they had proposed for the Court to proceed were not in accordance

    On 9 October 2012 the Labour Court dismissed the case.

(b)     The note the Court of First Instance had sent to the Court of Appeal had not been sent to the applicant either.

On 6 October 2010 the Donetsk Regional Court of Appeal upheld the local court’s decision as to the applicant’s guilt and reduced the term of his imprisonment to eight years.

On 25 January 1995 the Gdańsk Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the Regional Court’s decision of 17   January   1995.

For the Court to find that a speech in Parliament, by a Member of Parliament, fell outside the scope of his or her parliamentary activity would be unprecedented, and would run counter to the operation

LG COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Audience publique du 27 mai 2021 Cassation partielle M.

He failed to do so and the Court’s further attempts to reach him by phone were futile.

In the event of a conviction, the reasons had to be based on those facts examined in the course of the deliberations which had convinced the assize court in respect of each of the charges brought against

In the event of a conviction, the reasons had to be based on those facts examined in the course of the deliberations which had convinced the assize court in respect of each of the charges brought against

    On 17 March 1999 the court dismissed the applicant's claims as unsubstantiated and allowed the counter-claim, ordering the applicant to pay 269 Ukrainian hryvnias (UAH) [1] to Krymenergo.

The court also removed its earlier stay of the proceedings clause in view of the Polish court’s declining of jurisdiction over the case on 14 July 2016.