In the leading cases of Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014 and Lakatos v.

    In the leading case of Gankin and Others v. Russia, cited above, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 11.

    In the leading cases of Andrey Smirnov v. Russia, no. 43149/10, 13   February 2018, Resin v. Russia, no. 9348/14, 18 December 2018, Chaldayev v.

    In the leading case of Gankin and Others v.

Such approach would exclude a review of the duration of the proceedings in their entirety and is susceptible of leading to a result inconsistent with the Court’s practice. 21.

    In the leading cases of Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012 and Butko v.

    In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, 28   March   2006 and Sukachov v.

    In the leading case of Krasnoshapka v.

    In the leading case of Sergey Babushkin v.

    In the leading case of Nakhmanovich v. Russia, no. 55669/00, 2   March 2006, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 12.

    In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, 28   March 2006 and Sukachov v.

    In the leading case of Sergey Babushkin v.

    In the leading case of Sergey Babushkin v.

    In the leading cases of Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, 9 November 2004 and Efimenko v.

    The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in the leading case of Karelin v.

    In the leading case of Gankin and Others v.

    In the leading case of Merit v. Ukraine, (no. 66561/01, 30 March 2004), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading cases of Dirdizov v. Russia (no. 41461/10, 27   November 2012) and Zherebin v.

She also claimed compensation for non ‑ pecuniary damage, leaving the amount to be awarded to the discretion of the Court. She further claimed EUR 1,700 in respect of costs and expenses.

    In the leading case of Sergey Babushkin v.