At one stage R.G. had taken out his knife, which had put an end to the fight, and the two groups had then gone their separate ways.

Their horses had died and they had both fallen to the ground. He stated that it had been dark but there had been moonlight.

The applicant requested that they replace the tip of the alcotest (breath-analyser), as it might have been used by another person. This request allegedly infuriated the policemen.

They made the same statements as in the application form (see paragraph 14 above) and added that none of them or their friends or family had been injured in the forest fires, and nor had their family suffered

of the money they had with them).

them, and why they had limited their role to warning the applicants to leave rather than taking any steps to avert the attack.

Bam, bam, always there, on the knees, bam, he didn’t even use cream, bam, there on the knees, until [they] can bear it.” 6 .

during the nuclear tests at the time they issued their claim, they lacked knowledge of attributability because at that time there was no available scientific evidence.

The children invariably stated that they wanted to live with the applicant, complained that their mother shouted at them and whipped them with a belt, and protested, crying, that they did not want to return

They concluded that İ.A. had not created the disputed musical works and that he had only performed them in their already existing original forms. 19 .

He had informed them about the abduction and then reported the incident to the head of the ROVD.

By doing this the planners proved how "scientific" they were.

(ii)     The deputy head and teachers of the high school had not neglected their duties towards the victim or his parents and, in any event, there was no causal link between their alleged failure

For those applicants who complained that they stood to risk losing their homes from the hunting ban, this was not the necessary or intended consequence of the 2004 Act and none of them had been evicted

One of them asked me where I was from and called me to be a witness to the search of the applicant. They informed me that they were policemen.

It was open to the applicants to lodge a complaint under the 2004 Act in the latter proceedings with a view to speeding them up since they were decisive for their rights, but they failed to do so (see

The police then intervened to disperse the group; the applicants were allegedly injured during this incident as a result of the force used by the police.

The parents resisted the involvement of social services. The local authority offered them assessments at Turning Point in respect of their use of alcohol but these were declined.

If there is something and it is revealed to your Honour, we are then in this position: we will conduct the voir dire along the line that I have indicated in previous skeleton arguments and in the current