person would invade his privacy.

    The applicant complained that the publication of his personal data on the Tax Authority’s website for his failure to comply with his tax obligations had infringed his right to private life

No letters of administration having been granted for his estate, his lawful heirs are his wife, Mrs   Andriana Yianni Kyriakou and his two sons, Andreas Ioannou and Kyriakos Ioannou.

He submitted that his detention lasted too long. 2.

In the Government’s view, the applicant had not disputed either the existence of his contractual debt to the company F.H. Ltd. or his failure to pay it.

The applicant appealed against both his conviction and sentence. The Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal on 5 March 1980. 9.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private ... life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

means and the reasons for his failure to pay the poll tax.

In the following days his health improved.   29.

  At his discharge he received a medical certificate prescribing that he was to remain under constant supervision by his family and that, whenever necessary, he could be re-detained.

He alleged that the respondent State tried to hinder, prevent and render impossible the production and distribution of his newspaper. A. The Government’s preliminary objections 1.

    The applicant's appeal against the detention order, like his further appeals against decisions prolonging his detention and all his subsequent numerous applications for release and appeals

decision had been given on his request for their exclusion. 6.

Even if his proceedings against the Ministry of Defence had ended in his favour, he could still claim to be a victim of the violations of Article 6 about which he complains: the proceedings instituted

    On 16 March 2000 the applicant supplemented his observations.   His pleading was transmitted to the Government on 29 March 2000.

family and his own social rehabilitation...

, ès qualités, Immatriculée au registre du commerce et des sociétés de BOBIGNY sous le numéro 981 863 103, Dont le siège social est situé [Adresse 2] [Localité 7] Représentée par Me Béatrice HIEST

A.I. disagreed with SACA's decision on his dismissal and lodged a court action seeking his reinstatement.

had been applied during his campaign, and that he had had to hold his campaign meeting in a sports centre which was far away from the city centre.

He also challenged the grounds for his detention, reiterating in substance his previous arguments. 77.