account of the excessive length of certain criminal proceedings brought against the applicant and of Article 8 on account of the unjustified supervision by the prison authorities of his application form sent

The applicant was discharged from that hospital on 27 April 2015 in seemingly good condition, and sent to Sofia Prison Hospital.

By letters dated 11 and 12 July 2022 respectively, sent through eComms, the applicants’ representatives were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations   had expired on

THE LAW By letter dated 8   February 2010 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply

By letter dated 20 February 2007, the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 3 April

(the local Roma leader) and that the correspondence in connection with the current application should be sent to his grandfather’s address. No authority form had been enclosed to this letter.

Denmark - 38058/09 Judgment 14.6.2011 [Section I] Article 8 Expulsion Article 8-1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Refusal to renew residence permit of minor who had been sent abroad by

THE LAW By letter dated 3 August 2006 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 14

    The application concerns the decision of the penitentiary institution to seize the attachments of a letter sent to the applicant by his lawyer. 2.

On 4 June 2008 the Registry of the Court sent the applicant's representative another letter by registered mail stating that unless he submitted the required information by 18 June 2008, the Court would

The summons to the hearing was sent to the applicant’s known address in St Pölten.

By letter dated 21 December 2021, also sent via eComms, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations   had expired and that no extension of time had been

By letters sent by registered post or through the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms), the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired

On 28 August 2020 the applicants’ representative sent to the Court a completed application form.

On 9   April 2008 the Justice of the Peace of Circuit no. 2 of the Krasnosulinskiy district, Rostov Region (“the Rostov Justice”) sent a letter rogatory to the courts of Tyumen Region, asking them

On 25 October 2000 the Consul-General of Hungary in Istanbul sent a letter to the Istanbul State Security Court. The Consul-General requested the court to appoint a lawyer to defend the applicant.

FÉVRIER DEUX MILLE QUATRE, La cour d'appel de VERSAILLES, a rendu l'arrêt suivant dans l'affaire entre : APPELANTE Madame Maria Carmen X... épouse Y... née le 23 Juin 1947 à ZARAGOZA de nationalité 32 Sente

By letter dated 30 April 2008, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of the applicant’s observations had expired on 10 April 2008 and

By letter dated 8   June 2017, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of her observations had expired on 19   April 2017 and that no extension

By letter of 22 January 2009, sent by registered post to the applicant’s representatives, the Court noted, inter alia , that the period allowed for submission of the applicant’s observations had expired