CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

135 322 résultats pour « Theis »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0111DEC007652301

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2005

11 janvier 2005

The applicants stated that they received this invitation on 31 December 1992.

Source officielle

Page 79 sur 6767

← PrécédentSuivant →
CC

civ3

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:C301112

Cassation

9 novembre 2017

9 novembre 2017

de l'apparence permet à un acquéreur a non domino de devenir propriétaire, entraînera la cassation de l'arrêt, qui est fondé sur cette théorie ; 2°/ que la théorie de l'apparence ne peut jouer que lorsque

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324DEC001489006

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2009

24 mars 2009

They claimed that upon M.’s death this claim had passed to them as M.’s heirs.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1024DEC004478798

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2000

24 octobre 2000

Accordingly, there was no reasonable doubt that it was their voices on the tapes, or about the reliability of the tapes as evidence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0507DEC004099702

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2013

7 mai 2013

In the present cases, the police attempted to contact the applicants and invited those whom they located to attend to give their statements.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD001720303

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2008

13 novembre 2008

    Having established that the applicants were the undisputed owners of this land, the Court considers that there was an interference with their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3055

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2006

28 novembre 2006

that in any event, although such a partnership would offer them the majority of the legal protection offered by a marriage, the protection given is not identical, in particular with regard to their property

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3053

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2006

28 novembre 2006

that in any event, although such a partnership would offer them the majority of the legal protection offered by a marriage, the protection given is not identical, in particular with regard to their property

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0305JUD005047420

Admin. suprême

5 mars 2026

5 mars 2026

On 8 June 2017 they were arrested, and the next day the Ordzhonikidzevskyi District Court of   Zaporizhzhya ordered their detention on remand, referring to the gravity of the charges against them

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0628DEC002594694

Admin. suprême

28 juin 1995

28 juin 1995

This permit was later prolonged until October 1988. In the autumn of 1987 the applicant met Ms. S., who is also a citizen of the Philippines. In April 1988 they started cohabiting.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5524

Admin. suprême

2 août 2001

2 août 2001

Suspicion again fell on them after two further armed robberies. In December 1997 the investigating judge ordered their detention pending trial. They appealed against that order.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1898300-1993692

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2007

18 janvier 2007

  They alleged that, there, they were again interrogated and tortured to force them to make false confessions: they were beaten, threatened, strangled and subjected to electric shocks and their fingers

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0209JUD001985904

Admin. suprême

9 février 2010

9 février 2010

This was done when the first defenders, despite their opposition to the motion, failed to appear.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0503DEC002158602

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2007

3 mai 2007

In the applicants’ submission, they were denied access to a report on the results of this examination. On the same date the bodies were returned to the applicants, who buried them.

Source officielle
CC

comm

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:CO00233

Cassation

7 mai 2025

7 mai 2025

La société The Family Fellowship Llp (la société The Family Fellowship) et la société The Family Global Godfathers Spc (la société The Family Global Godfathers) font partie d'un groupe de sociétés spécialisées

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0301DEC001357288

Admin. suprême

1 mars 1991

1 mars 1991

  Cramér, but this was refused by the Court.   They did, however, instruct Mr.   Cramér also to assist them in the court proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0417JUD003500013

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2018

17 avril 2018

They argued that even though they had not raised this issue before the domestic courts, the latter should have examined this type of matter proprio motu .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704JUD001258405

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2017

4 juillet 2017

The application numbers, the dates of the lodging of the applications and the dates of their communication, the applicants’ names, their personal details and the names of their legal representatives are

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0118JUD002515494

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2001

18 janvier 2001

They regard travelling as detrimental to both the health of their family and to the education of their children.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0329JUD007271301

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2005

29 mars 2005

This list does not include a “prognosis with the details”, and therefore the liability of the defendants is engaged regardless of “whether they intended to evaluate the developments in the course of the

Source officielle