CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0111DEC007652301
11 janvier 2005
The applicants stated that they received this invitation on 31 December 1992.
Page 79 sur 6767
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:C301112
9 novembre 2017
de l'apparence permet à un acquéreur a non domino de devenir propriétaire, entraînera la cassation de l'arrêt, qui est fondé sur cette théorie ; 2°/ que la théorie de l'apparence ne peut jouer que lorsque
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324DEC001489006
24 mars 2009
They claimed that upon M.’s death this claim had passed to them as M.’s heirs.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1024DEC004478798
24 octobre 2000
Accordingly, there was no reasonable doubt that it was their voices on the tapes, or about the reliability of the tapes as evidence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0507DEC004099702
7 mai 2013
In the present cases, the police attempted to contact the applicants and invited those whom they located to attend to give their statements.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD001720303
13 novembre 2008
Having established that the applicants were the undisputed owners of this land, the Court considers that there was an interference with their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3055
28 novembre 2006
that in any event, although such a partnership would offer them the majority of the legal protection offered by a marriage, the protection given is not identical, in particular with regard to their property
ECLI:CEDH:002-3053
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0305JUD005047420
5 mars 2026
On 8 June 2017 they were arrested, and the next day the Ordzhonikidzevskyi District Court of Zaporizhzhya ordered their detention on remand, referring to the gravity of the charges against them
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0628DEC002594694
28 juin 1995
This permit was later prolonged until October 1988. In the autumn of 1987 the applicant met Ms. S., who is also a citizen of the Philippines. In April 1988 they started cohabiting.
ECLI:CEDH:002-5524
2 août 2001
Suspicion again fell on them after two further armed robberies. In December 1997 the investigating judge ordered their detention pending trial. They appealed against that order.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1898300-1993692
18 janvier 2007
They alleged that, there, they were again interrogated and tortured to force them to make false confessions: they were beaten, threatened, strangled and subjected to electric shocks and their fingers
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0209JUD001985904
9 février 2010
This was done when the first defenders, despite their opposition to the motion, failed to appear.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0503DEC002158602
3 mai 2007
In the applicants’ submission, they were denied access to a report on the results of this examination. On the same date the bodies were returned to the applicants, who buried them.
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:CO00233
7 mai 2025
La société The Family Fellowship Llp (la société The Family Fellowship) et la société The Family Global Godfathers Spc (la société The Family Global Godfathers) font partie d'un groupe de sociétés spécialisées
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0301DEC001357288
1 mars 1991
Cramér, but this was refused by the Court. They did, however, instruct Mr. Cramér also to assist them in the court proceedings.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0417JUD003500013
17 avril 2018
They argued that even though they had not raised this issue before the domestic courts, the latter should have examined this type of matter proprio motu .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704JUD001258405
4 juillet 2017
The application numbers, the dates of the lodging of the applications and the dates of their communication, the applicants’ names, their personal details and the names of their legal representatives are
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0118JUD002515494
18 janvier 2001
They regard travelling as detrimental to both the health of their family and to the education of their children.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0329JUD007271301
29 mars 2005
This list does not include a “prognosis with the details”, and therefore the liability of the defendants is engaged regardless of “whether they intended to evaluate the developments in the course of the