CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1205DEC000365202
5 décembre 2002
adjoint de section , Vu la requête susmentionnée introduite le 24 janvier 2002, Après en avoir délibéré, rend la décision suivante : EN FAIT Les requérants, M me Chrysoula Stavreti-Gounari, M me Mary
Page 8 sur 47
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1120DEC000827409
20 novembre 2018
This is indeed what happened, and many of these instances were due to the action of irregular armed groups on the South Ossetian side that would not or could not be adequately controlled by regular Russian
1ère Chambre A
5fdd7bd18067ba2782d387f4
11 septembre 2018
représentée par Me Alexandra A... de la F... , avocat au barreau de TARASCON, assistée par Me Steven G..., avocat au barreau de PARIS *-*-*-*-* COMPOSITION
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1210JUD000368620
10 décembre 2020
Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, Erik Wennerström
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003714918
21 janvier 2021
Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, Erik Wennerström, judges
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0204JUD006886010
4 février 2016
, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President, Khanlar Hajiyev, Julia Laffranque, Linos-Alexandre
JEX
6a0f7b90cdc6046d477ee507
21 mai 2026
Copies délivrées le : 1 cop dos + 2 exp [R] [G] + 2 grosses [F] [Z] [X] + 1 exp Me Florian FOUQUES + 1 grosse Me Mandy FLORES + 1 exp SAS Sorrentino Bruneau AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1216DEC000352914
16 décembre 2020
DECISION Application no. 3529/14 Zdzisław PARKITNY against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 16 December 2020 as a Committee composed of: Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0519JUD001649706
19 mai 2015
actions taken in the applicant’s favour, which should be considered as a “possession” within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - to remain inoperative to the detriment of one party (see among many
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1364236-1430460
9 juin 2005
Shoileva-Stambolova and Stefan Alexandrov Shoilev, are Bulgarian nationals, born in 1937, 1961, 1966, 1958, 1930, 1964 and 1968 respectively.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510JUD004155805
10 mai 2012
Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Nina Vajić, President, Anatoly Kovler, Elisabeth Steiner, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Julia Laffranque, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920DEC000896910
20 septembre 2011
; September 2011 as a Chamber composed of: Nina Vajić, President, Elisabeth Steiner, Khanlar Hajiyev, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Julia Laffranque, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213DEC003045709
13 décembre 2011
However, she did not wish to marry this man and fled Afghanistan in order to prevent the marriage from taking place. The applicant arrived in Greece by boat from Turkey in January 2008.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD001071109
13 novembre 2014
Austria, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President, Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0409DEC001312919
9 avril 2024
BVerfG, decision of 25 April 2005 (1 BvR 644/05) – “Queen Mary II”) in order to set in motion one single procedure for the constitutional complaint as a whole.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0412JUD004362613
12 avril 2016
2 EUR 15,000 (fifteen thousand euros) 43666/13 28/06/2013 43682/13 28/06/2013 Maria BENDORFEAN 01/08/1961 Cioponești, Vâlcea County Alexandra-Ioana POTEREANU [
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0608DEC005041713
8 juin 2021
The applicant, Ms Alexandra Grypari, is a Greek national who was born in 1954 and lives in London. She was represented before the Court by Mr G.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0116DEC006063316
16 janvier 2018
According to the Court’s well-established case-law (see, among many other authorities, Gasus Dosier- und Fördertechnik GmbH v. the Netherlands , 23 February 1995, § 62, Series A no. 306 &
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530DEC001351014
30 mai 2017
The Court’s primary concern under Article 6 § 1 is to evaluate the overall fairness of the criminal proceedings (see, among many other authorities, Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0630JUD005136209
30 juin 2016
The applicants pointed out, lastly, that the aim of their application was not to obtain a right to marry or access to a form of registered partnership.