Greece; 24.11.1994, Beaumartin v. France; 31.10.1995, Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece ( Article 50 ); 18.12.1996, Loizidou v. Turkey ( merits ); 26.11.1997, Sakık and Others v.

  Autriche , 22   octobre 1984, §   36, série   A n o 84, et Beaumartin c. France , 24 novembre 1994, §   38, série   A n o   296 ‑ B).

France , no. 36677/97, §§ 46-48, ECHR 2002-III) or where requisite domestic legislation applying it has been enacted (see Beaumartin v. France , 24 November 1994, §§ 27-28, Series A no. 296-B).

  the   Netherlands , 17 December 1996, § 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ VI; Beaumartin v. France , 24 November 1994, § 38, Series   A no.

applicable where an action is “pecuniary” in nature and is founded on an alleged infringement of rights which are likewise pecuniary rights, notwithstanding the origin of the dispute (see, for example, Beaumartin

§ 46-48, ECHR 2002 ‑ III, concerning a failure to bring the domestic law into line with a Community directive) or where the requisite domestic legislation applying it has been enacted (see Beaumartin

A l'appui de sa thèse, la société requérante invoque la jurisprudence de la Cour, notamment les arrêts Beaumartin c. France, Ringeisen c. Autriche, König c. Allemagne.   52.

Suisse , 29 avril 1988, §   64, série A n o 132, et surtout l’arrêt Beaumartin c. France , 24 novembre 1994, § 38 et 39, série A n o   296 ‑ B). 62.

satisfies a number of requirements, such as independence of the executive and also of the parties, amounts to a “tribunal” within the meaning of the said provision (see, among other authorities, the Beaumartin

§ 46-48, ECHR 2002 ‑ III, concerning a failure to bring the domestic law into line with a Community directive) or where the requisite domestic legislation applying it has been enacted (see Beaumartin

that those two texts gave rise to a right of the applicants to compensation which can be considered as a “possession” within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, mutatis mutandis , the Beaumartin

D.H., arrêt Beaumartin c/France du 24 novembre 1994, série A n° 296-B, p. 63, par. 38).

Autriche , 22 octobre 1984, § 36, série A n o 84, et Beaumartin c. France , 24 novembre 1994, § 38, série A n o 296-B).

23 February 2016; see also, from the point of view of the right to a court having jurisdiction to examine all the factual and legal issues relevant to the determination of the dispute before it, Beaumartin

applicable where an action is “pecuniary” in nature and is founded on an alleged infringement of rights which are likewise pecuniary rights, notwithstanding the origin of the dispute (see, for example, Beaumartin

  Austria , 28 June 1990, §§ 69-70, Series A no. 179; Beaumartin v.

Sweden , 7 July 1989, § 66, Series A no. 159; Beaumartin v.

    The Qualifications Chamber further held, with reference to the Court’s judgments in cases of Beaumartin v.