CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226113
29 juin 2023
APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention during transport) No. Application no.
Page 8 sur 2617
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0418JUD005803219
18 avril 2024
Russia , no. 38004/12, 17 July 2018, as regards placement of detainees in a metal cage or a glass cabin during court hearings; Reshetnyak v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-210669
25 mai 2021
Turkey 06/06/2017 Lack of reasonable suspicion Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure/delay in examining requests for enlargement/objection
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013JUD003172102
13 octobre 2009
During the trial, the applicant denied any connection with the PKK.
ECLI:CEDH:001-114349
12 octobre 2012
During his stay in that prison he was subjected to various forms of ill-treatment (he was held in a punishment cell during seven months, he was handcuffed during first two months of his detention, he was
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1026JUD000526119
26 octobre 2023
The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD002445317
10 novembre 2022
38004/12, §§ 145-50 and 166-72, 17 July 2018, as regards detention in a metal cage or glass cabin during court hearings and inability to communicate freely and privately with a lawyer during the
Cour d'Appel
6253c8ffbd3db21cbdd86f46
3 février 2004
Elles exposent qu'il est acquis aux débats que l'origine du sinistre est imputable à l'inflammation d'un jet d'essence provenant de la perforation de la durit pouvant avoir trois causes, un vice propre
ECLI:CEDH:001-214418
23 novembre 2021
Turkey 22/09/2020 Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 5 43721/20 Akdağ v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-187664
19 octobre 2018
Application no. 53848/09 also concerns the use of the evidence obtained under alleged duress during the preliminary investigation stage (see Özcan Çolak v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1107JUD002138004
7 novembre 2013
During the trial the applicant was represented by a different lawyer.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1130JUD000321919
30 novembre 2023
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10904
24 mars 2016
(d) The first applicant’s placement in a metal cage during court hearings – According to the Court’s case-law, holding a person in a metal cage during a trial constituted in itself an affront
ECLI:CEDH:001-142511
18 mars 2014
during his police custody.
ECLI:CEDH:001-167282
15 septembre 2016
He was allegedly ill-treated by the police during the arrest.
ECLI:CEDH:001-155546
29 mai 2015
officers during the pre-trial investigation.
ECLI:CEDH:001-177246
30 août 2017
of Ms Taisa Artsuyeva, who was born in 1989 and died during the attack.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0215JUD002827921
15 février 2024
The applicants complained principally under Article 3 of the Convention of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0111JUD000513619
11 janvier 2024
The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0201JUD002731519
1 février 2024