observations on admissibility and merits of that company’s complaint or serve it with its additional submissions, and, eventually, quashed a final, binding and enforceable judgment which was in its favour

On the same day, the IPC accepted the settlement between the parties and made an award in the indicated amount in the applicant’s favour.

GEORGIA against Georgia lodged on 27 September 2024 communicated on 16 December 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged non-enforcement of a final judgment rendered in favour

Criminal Code for aiding and abetting the PKK, an illegal organization, and subsequently under section   7(2) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (Law no. 3713) for disseminating propaganda in favour

STOYANOV and Valentin Stoyanov TABAKOV against Bulgaria lodged on 8 September 2014 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the non-enforcement of final domestic judgments in the applicants’ favour

Portalis DBVM-V-B7I-MP25 C2 N° minute : 1ère Chambre Civile copie exécutoire délivrée le : à : la SELARL CABINET LAURENT FAVET

A B d'évacuer sans délai l'emplacement qu'il occupe sans autorisation sur la plage de Favone à Sari-Solenzara et de retirer les ouvrages qu'il y a installés. Il soutient que M.

Access to court Supervisory review of a final and binding judgment: violation Facts : In 1993 the Supreme Court quashed a judgment of the Regional Court and upheld earlier judgments in the applicant’s favour

C'EST EN RAISON DE L'ETABLISSEMENT DES CHEQUES INCRIMINES QUE LE DEMANDEUR A ETE PRIVE DE SON DU " ; ATTENDU QU'IL RESULTE DES ENONCIATIONS DE L'ARRET ATTAQUE QUE DAME Y..., GERANTE DE LA SOCIETE FABOTEX

According to the arrest report, during the festival events a group of people started to disseminate propaganda in favour of PKK/Kongra-Gel, an armed illegal organisation.

It appears that the final judicial decisions in the applicants’ favour have remained unenforced.

of the Grand Chamber Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Allegations of inadequate conditions in a forest near the Latvian-Belarusian border and in a tent in Latvia: relinquishment in favour of the

The judgments in the applicants’ favour were taken on various dates between October 2011 and January 2024.

Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Non-conviction based “preventive confiscation” of the applicants’ home and other assets presumed to be proceeds of unlawful activities: relinquishment in favour

On various dates the applicants brought proceedings against private parties and obtained final court decisions in their favour.

On 4 August 2005 the Town Court held in the applicant’s favour and in addition awarded him a sum corresponding to the missing payments between 2002 and 2005.

On 1 August 2023 the applicant wrote to the prosecutor complaining of the authorities’ failure to implement the final decision in his favour.

under Article 6 of the Convention and under Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 as a result of the authorities’ failure to comply with final judicial decisions delivered by domestic courts in their favour

    The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of the Protocol No.1 to the Convention that despite the judgments given in their favor, the authorities had not

prosecuting authorities at the HCCJ decided to separate the investigation concerning the sixteen civilian defendants from the investigation involving military personnel, and to relinquish its jurisdiction in favour