From the material submitted by the applicant, it transpires that at the time of both alleged intrusions the flat was under the control of Z. 9.

When the police officers knocked on the door of the flat where three members of the organisation were believed to be living, a person from inside the flat opened fire through the closed door.

It entitled holders of specially protected tenancies of flats in social or State ownership to purchase their flats from the provider of the flat under favourable conditions. 7.

The applicant opened the door, began yelling at the officers, tried to kick and punch them, and locked himself in the flat. Two more officers were called.

Reference is made, in particular, to discrepancies regarding the actual circumstances of both test purchases, R.s flat’s search and the seizure of the banknotes in various statements of officer D. and

Seamarks, both tier two negotiators, on route to GPS.’ The Information Room Inspector states that an attempt was made to contact D.I. McCart both on his home number and on his pager. D.I.

The applicant rents a flat owned by the municipal authorities.

The municipality’s CTP further decided to demolish both buildings and ordered the Construction Police to enforce the decision. 2.

In May 1996 the cooperative sold the flat to Mr B. under the 1993 Act. The sale was registered in the Land Registry and Mr B. became the legal owner of the flat.

Both the applicant and her husband worked at a rubber-production company. In 2000 the company provided the applicant’s husband with a flat in which all the family resided.

Two flats in the house are occupied under a lease by families P. and S. respectively.

On 14 March 1995, the police requested itemised billing for calls from the telephone in B.’s flat.

The first and second applicants, both of whom have learning disabilities, were effectively imprisoned in their council flat over the weekend of 17 ‑ 19   November 2000, during which time they

the Restitution of Flats Act 1998).

Greffier lors des débats : Mme Flavie DRILHON. Les parties ont été avisées que le prononcé de la décision aurait lieu par mise à disposition au greffe le 17 octobre 2025.

Owing to the Applicant's frequent absence, his mother let part of the flat to a sub-tenant. On ..

The construction of the building in which the flat was to be located did not commence. 11.

Selon elle, la devise en latin se traduirait par la mention « la flamme ne s'éteint jamais ».

Another document concerning the fees for the use of the flat established by the owner on   10   September 1984 mentioned the applicant’s father as the user of the flat and both the applicant

He also made ambiguous, contradictory, or otherwise questionable declarations concerning the flat, including a claim that a payment of ALL   2,868,000 before 2003 covered both the flat and the garage