CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1209JUD000771406
9 décembre 2010
his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal ...”
Page 8 sur 8
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0716JUD000845304
16 juillet 2009
The fact that he was able to defend himself in the proceedings merely ensured a fair trial but did not prove that he had a “right to a court”. 36.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0628JUD003654903
28 juin 2007
He relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention which, in so far as relevant, provides: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a]
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0410JUD002206207
10 avril 2014
In determining whether the proceedings as a whole were fair, regard must also be had to whether the rights of the defence have been respected.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1119JUD001852702
19 novembre 2009
Croatia , no. 40116/02, § 8, 11 and 51, ECHR 2007 ‑ VI), and anal fissure caused by several attackers in highly intimidating circumstances (see Nikolay Dimitrov v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0716JUD003735909
16 juillet 2014
Faurie , Senior Officer, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Ms K.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1125JUD003025103
25 novembre 2010
Croatia (dec.), no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII). 41 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0122JUD002305703
22 janvier 2009
He relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which provides, in so far as relevant: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0322DEC001028006
22 mars 2011
Croatia (dec.), no. 33244/02, ECHR 2006-XII, and the references cited therein).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417JUD003192508
17 avril 2012
Croatia (dec.), no. 43440/98, ECHR 2000 ‑ X; Kuna v. Germany (dec.), no. 52449/99, ECHR 2001 ‑ V (extracts); Lenz v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316JUD004218405
16 mars 2010
They are practical and fair. Furthermore, I think that this is very much a case in which Parliament is entitled to decide whether the differences justify a difference in treatment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1116JUD000092605
16 novembre 2010
Zupančič, Nina Vajić, Anatoly Kovler, Elisabet Fura, Sverre Erik Jebens, Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, Päivi Hirvelä, Luis López Guerra, Mirjana Lazarova
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0731JUD000177411
31 juillet 2014
He also alleged that the administrative proceedings before the Justice of the Peace and the court had fallen short of guarantees of a fair hearing.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1023JUD001417409
23 octobre 2014
In the case of Stojanovski and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0629DEC003676006
29 juin 2010
States' legislative framework should, so far as possible, recognise that different degrees of incapacity may exist and that incapacity may vary in time.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1125DEC001014013
25 novembre 2014
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 25 November 2014 as a Chamber composed of: Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Julia
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0730JUD003967803
30 juillet 2015
As far as relevant, those Articles read as follows: Article 6 § 1 “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ...