nationales, lorsqu’elles sont confrontées à la nécessité de prolonger une mesure de détention provisoire, de prendre en considération les mesures alternatives prévues par la législation nationale ( Jabłoński

  17, §   24; Jabłoński   v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   102, 21 December 2000; Mõtsnik   v. Estonia , no.

Indeed, that Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jablonski

analysée, les instances internes aient envisagé l’application d’autres mesures préventives qui auraient permis d’assurer la comparution du requérant au procès ( Idalov , précité, §§   140 et 148, et Jablonski

Lorsqu’elles décident si une personne doit être libérée ou détenue, elles doivent rechercher s’il n’y a pas d’autres mesures qui permettraient d’assurer sa comparution au procès ( Jablonski c.

  Switzerland , 13 July 1983 , Series A no. 66, and Jablonski v. Poland , no.   33492/96, 21 December 2000). 46.

Russia , no. 12993/05, §§ 53 to 59, 7 May 2015; Jablonski v.

Furthermore, when deciding whether a person should be released or detained, the authorities are obliged to consider alternative measures for ensuring his appearance at trial (see Jablonski v.

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV, and Jablonski v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000).

Christian, rapporteur public, - les observations de Me Dalibard, représentant la société Art Dan Ile-de-France, et celles de Me Jablonski, substituant Me Cailloce, représentant la communauté de communes

when deciding whether a person should be released or detained, the authorities have an obligation under Article 5 § 3 to consider alternative measures of ensuring his or her appearance at trial (see Jablonski

.; Jabłoński   v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   83, 21 December 2000; and Neumeister   v. Austria , 27 June 1968, §   4, Series   A no.   8).

.; Jabłoński   v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   83, 21 December 2000; and Neumeister   v. Austria , 27 June 1968, §   4, Series   A no.   8).

  543/03, §   41, ECHR 2006-X; Jabłoński   v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   83, 21 December 2000; and Neumeister v. Austria , 27 June 1968, §   4, Series A no. 8). 47.

  26772/95, §   153, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV, and Jabłoński v.   Poland , no.   33492/96, §   80, 21   December 2000).

.; Jabłoński   v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   83, 21 December 2000; and Neumeister   v. Austria , judgment of 27 June 1968, Series   A no.   8, §   4).

Indeed, that Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jabloński

When deciding whether a person should be released or detained, the authorities are obliged to consider alternative measures of ensuring his appearance at trial (see Jabłonski v. Poland , no.

Pour ce qui est des périodes considérées par la Cour comme excessives, ils renvoient notamment aux arrêts Jabloński c.   Pologne du 21   décembre 2000 (quarante-trois jours), Nikolov c.