There they sought permission to exhume the bodies and to bury them at the Prigorodnoye cemetery.

  The application was lodged with the European Court of Human Rights on 10 July 2007.

  76573/01, 2 July 2002).

   In a pleading registered on 30 July 1985 the applicants alleged that neither they nor their lawyer had been informed of the dates of the steps taken by the expert and that his report referred

The existence of the remedies must be sufficiently certain both in theory and in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness.

There they were ordered by their battalion to regroup again at Kontemenos where they arrived at about 15.00 hours.

They further maintained that there are no effective domestic remedies with respect to their Convention grievances.

There they were ordered to squat along the walls, each one was hit on the head with an iron rod and told to keep silent.

They alleged under Article 13 of the Convention that they had no effective remedy for their grievances under Article 1 of Protocol No.   1. THE LAW A.

They could not gain access to the property of the applicants as they were informed by gendarme officers that there might be land mines in the area.

tunnel) was performed on 19 July 2006; as approximately six months after the surgery the coronary angiography had showed that there had been leakage from the patch, the second operation was carried out

They also enclosed a letter signed by five residents of Grozny who confirmed that there had been curfew in operation at the time of Mr Ramzan Guluyev's abduction. 56.

n°65-557 du 10 juillet 1965 fixant le statut de la copropriété des immeubles bâtis, Vu les 1240 et suivants du code civil, Vu l’article 700 du code de procédure civile, A titre principal, - Dire et juger

They are instructed that they must not discuss the case with family, friends or anyone else or conduct their own research into the case. 2.

They were joined by the Commission on 2 July 1991 and declared admissible on 14 April 1998. They were transmitted to the Court on 1   November 1998.

According to the applicants there was no advance warning and they all only just managed to escape.

They concluded that they were satisfied that they had complied with their disclosure obligations. 24.     Further disclosure took place on 22 November 2012.

If there were such proceedings, they were requested to provide all the relevant details and documents.

They were sanctioned with fines (final decision: the Novgorodskiy District Court of the Novgorod Region, 5   July 2017). QUESTIONS 1.

They reiterated that there were no limits to the powers of the courts of constitutional jurisdiction to grant redress for Convention violations. 39.