#Bayerische Motorenwerke AG (BMW) και BMW Nederland BV κατά Ronald Karel Deenik.#Αίτηση για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως: Hoge Raad - Κάτω Χώρες.

inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 31396/09 by Jörn IPSEN against Germany The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 31 May 2010 as a Committee composed of:   Karel

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Karel

Représenté par Me Jeanne BAECHLIN de la SCP SCP Jeanne BAECHLIN, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : L0034 Assisté sur l'audience par Me Nathalie KARPIK de l'ASSOCIATION Laude Esquier Champey, avocat

Karpel, a lawyer practising in Lviv. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

[M] [O] et qui exploite un bar restaurant à [Localité 4] sous l'enseigne "Kartel" n'a procédé à aucune déclaration et ne s'est jamais acquittée de la rémunération équitable due aux artistes interprètes

Also the applicant Mr Karel Vogrinčič was a Slovenian national living in Slovenia. He was represented before the Court by Ms T. Koračin-Bohar, a lawyer practicing in Murska Sobota.

sD6CCE070 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:35.4pt; text-align:justify; font-size:11pt } Résolution CM/ResDH(2024)8 Exécution de la décision de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme Karel

#August De Vriendt tegen Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen (C-377/96), Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen tegen René van Looveren (C-378/96), Julien Grare (C-379/96), Karel Boeykens (C-380/96) en Frans Serneels (C-

. # August De Vriendt v Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen (C-377/96), Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen v René van Looveren (C-378/96), Julien Grare (C-379/96), Karel Boeykens (C-380/96) and Frans Serneels (C-381/

MRUZEK against the Czech Republic The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 25   March 2008 as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President ,   Karel Jungwiert

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s32664ADF { width:200.93pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 60786/13 Karel

} .sD6CCE070 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:35.4pt; text-align:justify; font-size:11pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2024)8 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights Karel

PARTIAL DECISION Application no. 67411/10 by O.A.M. and 14 Others against Denmark The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 25   January 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Karel

inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 2390/09 by Martin KUSCHMANN against Germany The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 31 May 2010 as a Committee composed of:   Karel

{ margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt }   Communicated on 12 October 2017   FIRST SECTION Application no. 62697/16 Monika KARPIUK

Représenté par Me NICOLAS HEQUET, Plaidant, avocat au barreau d'AVIGNON INTIMÉS : Monsieur [C] [X] [W] né le 22 Février 1959 à [Localité 8] [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] Représenté par Me Karelle

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Karel

DECISION Application no. 54298/10 by N.H.S. and 32 Others against Denmark   The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 6   January 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Karel

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sA187A805 { width:199.62pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 49635/11 Karel