CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0902DEC002115593
2 septembre 1994
Soyer, a lawyer practising in Vienna.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016DEC002627095
16 octobre 1996
On 1 October 1982 the applicant's lawyer sent the title deeds of the property to the applicant. In March 1983 (a date later accepted by the High Court) the applicant read the title deeds.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1014DEC001624790
14 octobre 1992
  THE LAW   1.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0603REP002828695
3 juin 1999
Huwyler, a lawyer practising in Schwyz, and Mr. B. Bernet, a lawyer practising in Zurich.   3.   The respondent Government were represented by their Agent, Mr Ph.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0702DEC002847595
2 juillet 1997
essentially to national law and lays down the obligation to conform to the substantive and procedural rules thereof.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001673790
22 septembre 1994
   Through his lawyer, Mr Pelladoah filed an appeal on points of law to the Supreme Court (Hoge Raad).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0403REP001239886
3 avril 1990
Gloss, a lawyer practising in St.   Pölten.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1202DEC002627795
2 décembre 1999
laws and imposed a fine on him.
7ème CHAMBRE CIVILE
668ecc822980a82f59d874a1
10 juillet 2024
JUGEMENT DU 10 Juillet 2024 54G N° RG 23/04345 N° Portalis DBX6-W-B7H-X2US Minute n° 2024/ AFFAIRE : [O] [T], [X] [M] épouse [T] C/ [B] [V] Grosse Délivrée le : à Avocats : Maître Loïc
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0428DEC003313202
28 avril 2005
He asked that the conviction be quashed and he and his lawyer be invited to the hearing. According to the applicant, neither he nor his lawyer was notified of the appeal hearing.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0902DEC002107892
Margareta and Roger Andersson judgment, loc. cit., pp. 26-28, paras. 80-85).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001486189
   Through his lawyer, the applicant filed an appeal on points of law to the Supreme Court (Hoge Raad).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0514REP001525289
14 mai 1993
On the other hand, in order not unduly to prolong the proceedings, the Federal Court at a later stage in fact refused the applicant's request for a new lawyer (see above, para. 29).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1130DEC003273196
30 novembre 1999
contrary to the law, or contrary to good faith.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0521DEC003161296
21 mai 1997
France, loc. cit, p. 28, paras. 77-78; No. 9088/80, loc. cit.; No. 9285/81, loc. cit.; No. 16152/90, Dec. 13.10.92, unpublished, p. 27; and No. 24381/94, loc. cit.).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0111DEC001933192
11 janvier 1994
  He was also heard on 31 January 1989 in the presence of his lawyer and of the applicant's lawyer.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0521DEC003176296
France, loc. cit, p. 28, paras. 77-78; No. 9088/80, loc. cit.; No. 9285/81, loc. cit.; No. 16152/90, Dec. 13.10.92, unpublished; and No. 24381/94, loc. cit.).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0706DEC003171696
6 juillet 1999
  Two days later the applicant’s lawyer received a message by telephone from the secretary of the public prosecutor to the effect that the clock had not been deposited at the registry of the Regional
civ3
6137226bcd580146773fccfe
4 mai 1995
(Pyrénées-Atlantiques), 4 / de la société civile professionnelle Lassie et Priou, architecte, résidence Plein Ciel, avenue de Mounède, Bayonne (Pyrénées-Atlantiques), défendeurs à la cassation ;
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515REP002283993
15 mai 1996
Court H.R., Piersack judgment, loc. cit.; and Kraska judgment of 19 April 1993, Series A no. 254-B, p. 50, para. 32).   44.
Page 8 sur 64