CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178843
23 octobre 2017
{ margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } Communicated on 23 October 2017 THIRD SECTION Application no. 36048/17 Edward Michael
Page 8 sur 29
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0831DEC000041002
31 août 2004
It is well established in the Court’s case law that a defect at first instance may be remedied on appeal, so long as the appeal body has full jurisdiction.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0314DEC001107902
14 mars 2006
They considered trustworthy the boy’s statement according to which the father had neither beaten him nor had he touched his body or asked the boy to touch his genitals.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0427JUD001936502
27 avril 2004
The fact that the Parole Board has never in fact recommended this applicant's release does not deprive him of the right to have a review by a body offering the requisite guarantees. 23.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0825DEC006165600
25 août 2005
Consequently, States are dispensed from answering for their acts before an international body until they have had an opportunity to put matters right through their own legal system.
cr
6079a8729ba5988459c4d4d8
20 octobre 2004
Jean-Michel, contre l'arrêt de la cour d'appel de LYON, 7ème chambre, en date du 24 septembre 2003, qui, pour abus de confiance, l'a condamné à 1 an d'emprisonnement avec sursis, 5 ans d'interdiction
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:0622JUD000261465
22 juin 1972
Michael Ringeisen, in 1965. The applicant complained, inter alia, of the length of his detention while on remand. 2.
Cour d'Appel
6253ccdbbd3db21cbdd91831
24 juin 2014
(attestation du 21 janvier 2012 pièce no 23 de l'appelant) et Mickaël D...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001609490
22 septembre 2009
She felt electricity passing through her body and realised that the baton was electric.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010JUD001331208
10 octobre 2017
The Court notes that the complaints intended to be made subsequently before the Court should have been made to the appropriate domestic body, at least in substance and in compliance with
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0110JUD005790800
10 janvier 2006
certificat médical du 12 août 1992, établi par le conseil spécialisé n o 4 de l'institut médico-légal de Bakırköy, qui, bien que ne diagnostiquant pas une psychose apparente, constata chez l'intéressé une bouffée
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0305DEC003599997
5 mars 2002
Furthermore, Chapter 16, Section 5, of the Code of Judicial Procedure provided: “When it is important to wait for a decision of another tribunal or some other body before a decision is given in a pending
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1246752-1309339
3 février 2005
Austria (no. 58141/00) Violation Article 6 § 1 The applicant, Michael Thaler, is an Austrian national, who was born in 1944 and lives in Innsbruck.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0302DEC003804197
2 mars 1999
Electric shocks were then administered to sensitive parts of his body.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68320-68788
14 novembre 2000
Dutch), Luigi Ferrari Bravo [1] (Italian), Corneliu Bîrsan (Romanian), Josep Casadevall (Andorran), Rait Maruste (Estonian), judges , Feyyaz Gölcüklü (Turkish), ad hoc judge , and also Michael
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1116DEC004804199
16 novembre 1999
Wrongdoing Complaints Act entitle a person to defend his rights against the allegedly unlawful acts of the authorities by way of a court action, or a hierarchical complaint to a superior administrative body
613725dacd5801467742101f
12 juin 2001
Michel, contre l'arrêt de la cour d'appel de BESANCON, chambre correctionnelle, en date du 17 octobre 2000, qui, pour pollution de cours d'eau, l'a condamné à 8000 francs d'amende et a prononcé sur
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0824DEC006086000
24 août 2004
The HBRB was “in law, a separate body from the authority” and “independent”.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0903DEC004626499
3 septembre 2002
On an unspecified date the applicant was seen by a doctor in İdil who noted in his medical report that there existed no bruises on the applicant’s body resulting from the use of force.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0627DEC004017198
27 juin 2000
In its judgment of 22 May 1995, the Regional Court ( Arrondissementsrechtbank ) of s’-Hertogenbosch convicted the applicant of homicide and of hiding and/or removing a body with the aim to