The court found that the proceedings had lasted an exceptionally long time and that they were expected to last several more years before a final judgment was given.

On the same day the court issued a new order on his detention. 6.

  As to the length of the applicant’s pre ‑ trial detention, the Court noted that it had lasted one year and eight months.

action in the future) and ordered a fresh examination of the case by the same District Court.

    Repetitive cases   In the following cases the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the Convention:     Violation of Article

In the alternative, the proceedings lasted from 16   December   1994 until 16 November 1998. 22.

On the same day I.

The court ordered the continuation of his detention on remand, for the same reasons as before.

As to the issue under Article 6 of the Convention, the Government submit that, unlike the situation in the case of Immobiliare Saffi (see Immobiliare Saffi v.

He maintained that the second set of the proceedings should not be examined in isolation from the first set, since both sets of the proceedings concerned a dispute with the same person regarding the same

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention of the length of the criminal proceedings against him, arguing that these had lasted five years and two months.

Two expert examinations were ordered by the courts at the respondent’s requests (lasted in total for about five months) and one examination was ordered at the applicant’s request (lasted for about four

The Court further notes that the proceedings before the Constitutional Court lasted for two years, ten months and twenty-three days.

Application by applicants' lawyer to Special Supreme Court - stay, pursuant to statute, of all proceedings pending in Supreme Administrative Court with same object: should have lasted only for time Special

Three other persons travelling in the same vehicle were also wounded. The applicant also lost three young nieces in the attack, and her nephew was left disabled as a result of his injuries.

(organisers of the public auction held in connection with the same proceedings connected to the bribery); (ii)     that the authorities failed to disclose to the defence certain court decisions

Subsequently, the same prosecutor opened the criminal proceedings against the applicant for traffic of influence and took a second statement from him.

On the same day he was taken into pre-trial detention. His detention ended on 17 October 2001 when his house arrest was ordered. That measure was terminated on 8 March 2002.

This culminated in an award to the association of EUR 4,500 in respect of non-pecuniary damage for proceedings which had lasted more than eleven years at two levels of jurisdiction.

The applicant was arrested by the police on the same morning while cleaning the taxicab from blood stains. A preliminary investigation for murder was opened against the applicant on the same day. 7.